As Jake Tapper’s “The Lead” Dips to New Low with “Coverage” of AE911Truth’s 9/11 Museum Brochure

CNN's The Lead with Jake Tapper It looked just like an infomercial, but with a lot more frowning.

In an example of Orwellian newspeak, the CNN show The Lead with Jake Tapper took on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth over its decision to distribute information pamphlets outside the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at Ground Zero in New York City. The pamphlets mimic the design of the "official" ones, but instead of the official story, they contain key scientific forensic evidence indicating that the three World Trade Center towers were brought down with explosives and incendiaries. Unlike the official version, the photo on the cover of the AE pamphlet shows the Twin Towers and Building 7.

The Tapper report is a hysterical compendium of all the empty slogans and anti-conspiracy-theory talking points that make up the mainstream media's continuing attack on the 9/11 Truth Movement. It didn't take more than a couple of seconds into the report to see how Tapper was going to play the story.

Introduction by AE911Truth staff

Jesse Ventura interviews Dr. Judy WoodWe've decided to update a three-year-old Frequently Asked Question that is receiving renewed attention in light of three recent episodes of Jesse Ventura's "Off the Grid" show. In the first episode, the host reviews his "Book of the Month Pick," Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. In the next two segments, he conducts a two-part interview with the book's author, Dr. Judy Wood.

David Cole is patterning his life's work after American patriot Samuel Adams, who wrote in a 1779 letter to fellow patriot James Warren, "If Virtue & Knowledge are diffus'd among the People, they will never be enslav'd. This will be their great Security."David Cole had for several years been independently investigating the National Institute of Standards and Technology — making multiple requests for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) records to obtain information on the September 11, 2001, collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 — when, in June 2013, he decided to join the AE911Truth's NIST Pursuit Team to further that goal.

Team leader Tony Szamboti couldn't be more pleased that Cole has brought his research skills and dedication to AE911 Truth's pursuit of justice for 9/11 victims, their families, and the rest of the world. He calls David "a meticulous and dogged researcher who has unearthed significant items in the 9/11 citizens' investigation of Building 7."

Paolo Attivissimo, a blogger and anchorman on Italian Swiss Radio, published an interview in February 2014 with Auckland New Zealand professor of civil engineering Charles Clifton on his blog Undicisettembre (Italian for "September 11"). The content of the blog indeed seems limited to the events of September 11, and Attivissimo states its goal is "conspiracy theory debunking."

Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story!

Debate: "a formal contest in which the affirmative and negative sides of a proposition are advocated by opposing speakers."Those who know the truth are the most confident to debate on its behalf. A case in point was the 9/11 Physics Debate. Behold, on the 911Truth side: mountains of irrefutable evidence; on the side of the official theory: pseudoscience and outright untruths. The oh-so-predictable result: no qualified takers willing to defend the view of the government/media establishment in an open forum.

The Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness (ANETA.org) sponsored a "Physics Olympics" debate between two top physicists in the spirit of the winter athletic events in Sochi, Russia.

Dr William Pepper speaking in Times Square on September 11, 2013 for ReThink911 eventOn behalf of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, esteemed human rights attorney William F. Pepper has followed up on his December 12, 2013 letter written to the U.S. Department of Commerce Office of the Inspector General (OIG), demanding that the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST"), a non-regulatory agency within the Commerce Department for which OIG has oversight responsibility, "be directed to produce a corrected analysis and report on the collapse of Building 7."

Having received a letter in return stating that the matter was being referred back to NIST, and hearing nothing further, Pepper personally called the OIG on March 3, 2014. He left a voicemail in which he identified himself and explained why he was calling.