Liquid metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower during the final seven minutes before its collapse on September 11, 2001. Was it a combination of steel and iron, or was it aluminum and/or lead? What was the molten metal reported under the rubble of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero? And why is the identification of the molten metal important?

Yellow-white glowing molten metal is seen pouring from the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. Accompanying white smoke was sometimes visible. NIST did not investigate the phenomenon.Although thirteen years have elapsed since that fateful day, the answer to these questions is still significant, because it discredits the US government's version of events on 9/11.

The problem with the official narrative is that the office fires — purportedly ignited by the crash of an airplane into each skyscraper — could not have melted iron or steel, although they could have melted aluminum or lead.

Put another way, the evidence does in fact demonstrate that the observed molten metal was indeed molten iron and molten steel, and that it could not have been either molten aluminum or molten lead.

200 Hundred Scientists Learn of Explosives in Buildings

An inaugural ethics conference sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) — the world's largest professional association dedicated to advancing technology — provided an exciting opportunity for AE911Truth to bring its message to the forefront of the scientific and engineering community last month.

IEEE promised that its 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology, held in Chicago on May 23-24, would offer "a rich scientific program of highest quality," feature speakers from throughout the world, and bring together "scientists, engineers, ethicists, and practitioners from different disciplines to discuss questions and concerns related to ethics in science, technology, and engineering."

Based on that billing, three 9/11 Truth Movement activists were inspired to respond to the call for papers with a case study addressing the topic "Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Science, Technology and Engineering." The resulting paper, Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study, was co-authored by physicist John D. Wyndham, Ph.D. (a member of Scientists for 9/11Truth) and engineers Wayne H. Coste, PE, and Michael R. Smith (both members of AE911Truth and the IEEE).

Editor's Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: "Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?" The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.

In answering the question in the title of this essay, last month's segment, Part 7, examined groupthink, a maladaptive manifestation of conformity in which the desire for unity by the group members results in an incorrect or deviant decision-making outcome, an inflated sense of certainty in decisions by the "in-group," and often irrational and dehumanizing actions toward an "out-group."

We continue Ms. Shure's analysis in "Part 8: Brain Research, Part 1," which examines how beliefs—and our tendency to hold onto beliefs—are encoded in our DNA and our central nervous system.

The Human BrainStudies suggest that some people have a brain structure that makes it difficult for them to tolerate ambiguity, conflict, or new ideas that contradict their worldviews (usually those who identify as conservatives), while other people find it easier to accept new social, scientific, or religious ideas (usually those who identify as liberals).¹

One of these studies reveals the discovery of a "liberal gene" that has been linked to a personality type that is driven to seek out new experiences.² Could this partially account for the fact that 2.5% of people from the Diffusion of Innovation studies, explored in Part 2, are more venturesome with new ideas?

One Man's Personal 9/11 Journey

New Movie Trailer for Campaign Launch

Dave Hooper presents his new film, "The Anatomy of a Great Deception," at its first screening, held at the Motor City Casino in Detroit last March.A personal journey of discovery began just over three years ago for businessman and filmmaker David Hooper when he began to ask questions about what really happened on September 11, 2001. The result of his quest is a ground-breaking documentary, The Anatomy of a Great Deception.

During his search for answers, each question Hooper asked led to another, until eventually he deduced that the official story of how 9/11 transpired simply couldn't be true. Besides the emotional upheaval of that realization, Hooper faced the added pain of feeling isolated from family members and friends, who shared neither his conclusions nor his conviction that America had been betrayed. So, as a way of reaching out to loved ones, Hooper decided to make the film, in hopes that it would help them grasp the facts that had shattered his worldview.

AE911Truth Slandered over 9/11 Museum Outreach — Legal Action Considered

Counter the attack on AE and its 9/11 Museum brochures

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth needs your energy and your outrage over how the organization and the cause of 9/11 Truth were treated by the mainstream media last month.

Specifically, we're asking you to write a letter to CNN to let the station know how you feel about the recent installment of The Lead with Jake Tapper. The five-minute report dealt with the AE911Truth initiative to distribute our alternative brochures at the site of the newly opened National September 11 Memorial and Museum, which we attended. You can send your letter to CNN via this link on its web site.

For background on the AE911Truth reaction to the CNN report, read the article currently posted on our website.

The Lead with Jake TapperTapper and Bazelon claimed that handing out museum brochures that mimicked the design of the "official" ones but contained an alternative perspective on 9/11 was an affront to the victims' families and that we were "spreading lies." They alleged that those who challenge the official story are motivated by anti-Semitism and a need to "make sense of the senseless." And, to no one's surprise, they ignored all the scientific evidence that AE and other experienced researchers have presented over the nearly 13 years since the event.

Controversy Brims at Grand Opening of 9/11 Museum AE911Truth On-Site to Set The Record Straight

There was an awakening in New York last week as 9/11 Truth activists converged at the World Trade Centers for the Grand Opening of the September 11 Memorial Museum.

AE911Truth held a "What you won’t find in this 9/11 museum" press conference at the entrance to the Memorial Grounds, speaking to a gathered audience of about two dozen people.