Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version

    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"

    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    AE911Truth Presents WTC Evidence to Malaysian War Crimes Conference
    Written by Susie Bonham-Craig with Richard Gage, AIA   
    Friday, 14 December 2012 11:04

    Former Prime Minister Calls for New 9/11 Investigation

    Editors Note: While we at AE911Truth do not speculate on who carried out the 9/11 attacks or hold an official position regarding other Middle East issues, we do applaud all of the participants in the International Conference to Criminalize War for questioning the official 9/11 story and demanding answers.

    Why Revisit 9/11? – a haunting question that rippled out from the introduction of the new documentary film from AE911Truth, 9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, and into the opening remarks of the historic four-day conference series held in Malaysia by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation from the 19th to the 22nd of November this year.

    The Foundation has a long history of bringing attention to war crimes

    The first of the three-part International Conference to Criminalize War, titled 9/11 Revisited - Seeking the Truth, was most important to our mission. The questions about 9/11, asked from halfway around the globe, are indicative of a world speaking out, a silent majority rising and bearing witness to its own crises, and a world whose citizens are experiencing the projected impacts of that fateful day just over a decade ago. Its message is being amplified for many around the world who are now seeing discrepancies in U.S. government accounts and corporate media portrayals.

    Dr. Tun Mahathir Mohamad, president of the Perdana Global Peace Foundation and former Prime Minister of Malaysia, opens the 9/11 Revisited: Seeking the Truth conference in Kuala Lumpur on November 19, 2012

    But why? Because many are awakening. Many are seeing where we, humanity as a whole, find ourselves today – bearing witness to the seepage now clearly visible in the form of war declarations, lost liberties, economic collapse, illegal military occupations, and crimes against humanity – and we want real answers to real, nagging questions, answers which have over the years been manipulatively elusive. Never before have we had such an opportunity to present the evidence in an international forum of such credibility, which was…

    Dubai Skyscraper Engulfed in Flames, Does Not Collapse
    Written by Eli Rika   
    Thursday, 13 December 2012 19:28

    Latest High-Rise Fire Reveals More Public Skepticism of Official 9/11 Story

    The Tamweel fire in Dubai in November sent flames though many floors, causing extensive damage -- but the building did not fall

    A high-rise building catches fire in a major city. All of its occupants are evacuated as fire crews arrive to put out the blaze. After a few hours, the flames spread across dozens of floors … and in the end, the building remains standing. That was the story last month in Dubai, the most populous city in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as the Tamweel Building was added to the long list of skyscrapers that have withstood major fires. This stark contrast to the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7, the only steel framed skyscrapers in history, whose…

    Tuesday, 04 December 2012 06:18
    Announcing Our New AE911Truth Membership Opportunity

    Announcing Our New AE911Truth Membership Opportunity

    Join Us Now!

    Welcome to our new Membership Opportunity at AE911Truth! Please see the letter below with all the details. See IMPORTANT UPDATES also.

    A Personal Message From Richard Gage, AIA

    Dear AE911Truth Supporter,

    I hope my letter finds you well!

    I am delighted that your generous support of AE911Truth and hard work at our cause are paying off!

    After an incredible year at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, we are finally getting close to a tipping point! become-a-member-button

    Outreach is getting easier. More people are receptive to our message. Our milestone documentary, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out became the #1 Most Viewed and Shared video on the PBS.org website during the…

    "Journey for 9/11 Truth" Accomplishes its Goal
    Written by Dick Scar, BSAE   
    Saturday, 24 November 2012 00:29

    Bike Riders Connect with Thousands Across the U.S.

    This report gives highlights of the second half of the 4000–mile bicycle rides Rena Patty and Pamela Senzee took across the country to educate middle America about the vital information detailed in 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out. They left a solid trail of bright points of enlightenment from the West Coast to the East Coast, connecting with locals and giving interviews to several newspapers and radio stations along the way. You can read complete accounts of their travels at 911JourneyforTruth.org.

    Rena Patty and Pam Senzee deliever the 9/11 evidence to the Burlington, Washington Fire Department.—Click on the image above to play the video clip…

    A big THANK YOU goes out to the 40 contributors who chipped in and surpassed our $3200 goal of…

    Friday, 23 November 2012 05:08


    Written by Adam Taylor


    Part 7: WTC 7 Fire and Column Failure

    Editor’s Note: This is Part 7 (see Part 6) of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of their book Debunking 9/11 Myths. We encourage you to submit your own reviews of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold.

    (Quotes from PM’s book are shown in red and with page numbers.)

    Although Popular Mechanics states the office fires in Building 7 reached temperatures of 1,100°F, both critics and supporters of the official story with technical expertise have pointed out that there is no evidence for fires that hot.

    The Popular Mechanics chapter regarding the mysterious collapse of WTC 7 shows itself to be no more promising than its previous chapter on the Twin Towers. PM begins this section by summarizing the history of the controversy surrounding Building 7 and the numerous investigations carried out regarding its collapse. PM correctly notes that many agencies were located in the building as tenants, including the Secret Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Internal Revenue Service, Securities and Exchange Commission, and New York City’s Office of Emergency Management. i  The chapter discusses the initial FEMA investigation and how, after FEMA failed to provide an explanation for Building 7’s collapse, the task was then handed over to NIST. PM touts the NIST report on Building 7 as having finally proved the building was not destroyed with explosives. Contrary to PM’s assertion that the reason for WTC7’s collapse is “ less complicated and even more remarkable” (pg 66) than…

    Wednesday, 21 November 2012 07:30

    How Did They Know?

    Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction

    Written by Dennis McMahon, J.D., L.L.M.

    WTC Building 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers Building or WTC 7, was a 47–story skyscraper that was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, Building 7 would have been the tallest high-–rise in thirty–three of our United States. Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Center, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker,” along with several major financial institutions.

    BBC correspondent Jane Standley reported the destruction of WTC 7 before it collapsed – even though the building was still standing behind her.

    Building 7, which was 100 yards from the Twin Towers, was not hit by an airplane on September 11, 2001, and suffered only minimal damage from debris falling from the North Tower. Several fires began burning on a few floors, and the entire building completely collapsed – almost into its own footprint – at 5:20 p.m. Numerous eyewitnesses, including members of the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and other first responders, and multiple news sources, made statements that indicate that there was foreknowledge that WTC 7 was going to come down, despite the fact that no skyscraper in history had ever completely collapsed due to fire. (Much of this evidence of foreknowledge is detailed on the website of the Remember Building 7 campaign and other related sites.)

    Where foreknowledge of an extremely unusual event is demonstrated, the possibility must be considered that the foreknowledge derived directly or indirectly from those who had inside information about, and/or control over, the event itself. Thus, if foreknowledge of the collapse of Building 7 can be shown, this would be a strong indication that Building 7 was subjected to controlled demolition, and that advance warning of Building 7’s demise derived ultimately from those who intended to bring the building down. Thus, foreknowledge of the collapse of Building 7 is not only consistent with, but supportive of, the controlled demolition hypothesis.

    Monday, 19 November 2012 23:36

    Join us on Facebook

    Make Social Networking a Pathway to 9/11 Truth

    Written by Eli Rika

    Do you have a profile on Facebook? Are you looking for a free, easy way to support the vital work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth that may also enlighten you in the process? Then join the more than 95,000 people who have “liked” the AE911Truth Facebook page and help us expand our reach across the globe.

    Our Facebook page is frequently updated with news and information related to our mission. It gives you access to a variety of valuable items, including:

    • Links to breaking news articles that are posted at AE911Truth.org before they get published in our monthly Blueprint E-Newsletter.
    • Coupon codes to use in the AE911Truth online store for discounts on our most popular documentaries and other educational materials.
    • Early announcements of upcoming events, including major screenings of our history–making PBS special, 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out, live presentations by founder Richard Gage, AIA, and outreach efforts across the country by other AE911Truth presenters.
    • Links to new videos produced by AE911Truth and affiliated organizations, like our Youtube hit, Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC7
    << Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next > End >>