left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    Explosive 9/11 Evidence Premieres Down Under
    Print
    E-mail
    Written by Dick Scar, BSAE   
    Sunday, 07 April 2013 04:41

    Top Australian News Sites Stream Experts Speak Out

    eso-small-imageWe are pleased to announce that the web editions of The Sydney Morning Herald, Australia’s most respected newspaper, and Melbourne’s The Age began showing 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out in February for free to residents of Australia and New Zealand. The link to our documentary, hosted on smh.tv, The Sydney Morning Herald’s video site, was shared on Facebook over 1,000 times in the first two weeks, signaling another bout of major mainstream exposure for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    The videos on these sites can be accessed only in Australia and New Zealand, so while you can’t view them from the U.S., you can still help boost the film’s rating on these sites. Just visit the following links:sydney-morning-herald

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out on The Sydney Morning Herald


    9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on The Age


    Even though the video says “Content Unavailable”…

    Read more...
     
    Architects and Engineers: Help Us Reach 2,000 A&E Petition Signers by September
    Print
    E-mail
    Written by Eli Rika   
    Sunday, 07 April 2013 04:35

    Refer a Colleague to AE911Truth

    As we approach this years’ 9/11 anniversary, we are coming closer to another important milestone in the history of AE911Truth. Almost 2,000 architects and engineers have signed our petition demanding a real 9/11 investigation, and our goal is to reach that mark by this September to highlight the launch of our historic Operation Tip the Planetad campaign. However, we can’t do that without your help. If you are a degreed or licensed architect or engineer who has reviewed the WTC evidence and who agrees with our call for an independent investigation, let your voice be heard by signing our petition now.panel-of-expertsNow is the perfect time to join the hundreds of architects and engineers who have signed the AE911Truth petition for a real WTC investigation.

    “If you have already signed the petition, then please inform your colleagues about AE911Truth and ask them to sign the petition. If you’re not an architect or engineer, encourage your friends, family members, and coworkers who may be architects and engineers to sign as well!”

    We value all of the supporters who have signed our petition, but the number of…

    Read more...
     
    Print
    E-mail
    Written by AE911Truth   
    Monday, 01 April 2013 18:17

    PENCILS DOWN!


    The Operation Tip the Planet
    Ad Contest Entries Are in!

     

    Read more...
     
    Debunking The Real 9/11 Myths: Why Popular Mechanics Can’t Face Up To Reality
    Print
    E-mail
    Written by Adam Taylor   
    Thursday, 28 March 2013 00:20

    Editor’s note: This is Part 9 (see Part 8) of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of Debunking 9/11 Myths. We encourage you to submit your own reviews of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold. For more information on the topics discussed in this section, see our FAQ on Larry Silverstein and our article that analyzes Barry Jennings’ testimony. (Quotes from Popular Mechanics’ book are shown in red and with page numbers.)

    Part 9:
    Larry Silverstein and Barry Jennings

    Larry Silverstein’s “Pull It” Quote

    Analysis of Larry Silverstein’s statements about WTC7 reveals that they do not match the sequence of events that occurred on 9/11

    PM’s next section deals with another controversial issue in the debate regarding WTC7 – the infamous quote from WTC7 owner Larry Silverstein regarding the building’s destruction. For reference, here is Silverstein’s full quote from his interview with PBS:

    “I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, “We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.” And they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.”1

    Read more...
     
    Friday, 15 March 2013 22:14

    Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
    Proudly Announces:


    THIS IS THE YEAR WE MAKE IT HAPPEN!

    In spite of the fact that the 9/11 truth message has been censored by many in the media, ignored by Congress and the President, and shunned by most academic institutions, polls still show that more than 30% of US citizens doubt the official story about 9/11. Let’s reach out to the rest!

    The terrifying specter of drone strikes on US civilians, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the National Defense Authorization Act… these are just a few disturbing consequences that continue to follow widespread acceptance of the official 9/11 narrative.

    Read more...
     
    FAQ #11: Does the NIST WTC 7 computer animation of the collapse prove that the skyscraper came down by fire?
    Print
    E-mail
    Written by Chris Sarns, Richard Gage, AIA, and Gregg Roberts   
    Wednesday, 13 March 2013 23:45

    No. The NIST WTC 7 computer animation of the collapse does not even remotely resemble the observations and actual video footage of the destruction in three main ways. A scientifically valid explanation of any phenomenon must account for the key observations. Moreover, a computer simulation does not constitute an explanation. It is merely a tool for determining and visualizing what might have happened if various assumptions are true.

    NIST has refused to disclose the computer inputs of its mathematical models. This makes it impossible for anyone to check their work.

    1. While NIST admits publicly that the building descended at “free-fall” acceleration, its computer simulation is not consistent with a building that is coming down in free fall.

    NIST’s Final Report on the collapse of WTC 7 (NCSTAR 1A, p. 45) states that gravitational acceleration (free-fall) of the main roofline occurred. It began when the point NIST was using [1] as its marker on the video had descended about 7 feet*. In Figure 12-62 (NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.2 p. 588) the roofline has descended about 10m /33 feet (NCSTAR 1-9A, p. 77) and the columns are still buckling in an irregular manner. Buckling columns provide resistance and would obviously prevent the building from collapsing at free-fall acceleration. The NIST computer model is clearly not simulating free-fall acceleration.

    Read more...
     
    The Canadian 9/11 Justice Petition Initiative: Continuing the Pursuit of a Real Investigation
    Print
    E-mail
    Written by Mike Bondi   
    Wednesday, 13 March 2013 22:42

    Editor’s Note:
    This article chronicles the ongoing efforts by Canadian 9/11 Truth activists to persuade their members of Parliament to call for a new 9/11 investigation. If you’d like to take part in this crucial campaign, send an email to Mike Bondi and tell him you want to help!

    Vancouver East MP Libby Davies became the first federal representative to call for a new 9/11 inquiry in the Canadian Parliament

    Canadian AE911Truth supporters are making the best of a unique opportunity that their government provides for obtaining a real 9/11 investigation. The petition process grants all Canadians the right to petition Parliament – but as we discovered, this can be an uphill battle.

    The general principle is that any Canadian may petition Parliament directly in a matter that cannot be resolved any other way. The first step is to create the petition and have it certified to be “in order” by the Clerk of Petitions. Once this is done, at least 25 signatures must be gathered.

    Parliamentary rules do not allow unelected citizens to be on the floor of Parliament. A Member of Parliament (MP) needs to agree to physically deliver a particular petition to the clerk’s desk inside Parliament.

    Read more...
     
    << Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next > End >>