Bike Riders Connect with Thousands Across the U.S.

This report gives highlights of the second half of the 4000–mile bicycle rides Rena Patty and Pamela Senzee took across the country to educate middle America about the vital information detailed in 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out. They left a solid trail of bright points of enlightenment from the West Coast to the East Coast, connecting with locals and giving interviews to several newspapers and radio stations along the way. You can read complete accounts of their travels at 911JourneyforTruth.org.

Rena Patty and Pam Senzee deliever the 9/11 evidence to the Burlington, Washington Fire Department.—Click on the image above to play the video clip…

A big THANK YOU goes out to the 40 contributors who chipped in and surpassed our $3200 goal of…

DEBUNKING THE REAL 9/11 MYTHS:

Written by Adam Taylor

WHY POPULAR MECHANICS CAN’T FACE UP TO REALITY

Part 7: WTC 7 Fire and Column Failure

Editor’s Note: This is Part 7 (see Part 6) of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of their book Debunking 9/11 Myths. We encourage you to submit your own reviews of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold.

(Quotes from PM’s book are shown in red and with page numbers.)

Although Popular Mechanics states the office fires in Building 7 reached temperatures of 1,100°F, both critics and supporters of the official story with technical expertise have pointed out that there is no evidence for fires that hot.

The Popular Mechanics chapter regarding the mysterious collapse of WTC 7 shows itself to be no more promising than its previous chapter on the Twin Towers. PM begins this section by summarizing the history of the controversy surrounding Building 7 and the numerous investigations carried out regarding its collapse. PM correctly notes that many agencies were located in the building as tenants, including the Secret Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Internal Revenue Service, Securities and Exchange Commission, and New York City’s Office of Emergency Management. ⁱ  The chapter discusses the initial FEMA investigation and how, after FEMA failed to provide an explanation for Building 7’s collapse, the task was then handed over to NIST. PM touts the NIST report on Building 7 as having finally proved the building was not destroyed with explosives. Contrary to PM’s assertion that the reason for WTC7’s collapse is “ less complicated and even more remarkable” (pg 66) than…

How Did They Know?

Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction

Written by Dennis McMahon, J.D., L.L.M.

WTC Building 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers Building or WTC 7, was a 47–story skyscraper that was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, Building 7 would have been the tallest high-–rise in thirty–three of our United States. Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Center, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker,” along with several major financial institutions.

BBC correspondent Jane Standley reported the destruction of WTC 7 before it collapsed – even though the building was still standing behind her.

Building 7, which was 100 yards from the Twin Towers, was not hit by an airplane on September 11, 2001, and suffered only minimal damage from debris falling from the North Tower. Several fires began burning on a few floors, and the entire building completely collapsed – almost into its own footprint – at 5:20 p.m. Numerous eyewitnesses, including members of the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and other first responders, and multiple news sources, made statements that indicate that there was foreknowledge that WTC 7 was going to come down, despite the fact that no skyscraper in history had ever completely collapsed due to fire. (Much of this evidence of foreknowledge is detailed on the website of the Remember Building 7 campaign and other related sites.)

Where foreknowledge of an extremely unusual event is demonstrated, the possibility must be considered that the foreknowledge derived directly or indirectly from those who had inside information about, and/or control over, the event itself. Thus, if foreknowledge of the collapse of Building 7 can be shown, this would be a strong indication that Building 7 was subjected to controlled demolition, and that advance warning of Building 7’s demise derived ultimately from those who intended to bring the building down. Thus, foreknowledge of the collapse of Building 7 is not only consistent with, but supportive of, the controlled demolition hypothesis.

Join us on Facebook

Make Social Networking a Pathway to 9/11 Truth

Written by Eli Rika

Do you have a profile on Facebook? Are you looking for a free, easy way to support the vital work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth that may also enlighten you in the process? Then join the more than 95,000 people who have “liked” the AE911Truth Facebook page and help us expand our reach across the globe.

Our Facebook page is frequently updated with news and information related to our mission. It gives you access to a variety of valuable items, including:

• Links to breaking news articles that are posted at AE911Truth.org before they get published in our monthly Blueprint E-Newsletter.
• Coupon codes to use in the AE911Truth online store for discounts on our most popular documentaries and other educational materials.
• Early announcements of upcoming events, including major screenings of our history–making PBS special, 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out, live presentations by founder Richard Gage, AIA, and outreach efforts across the country by other AE911Truth presenters.
• Links to new videos produced by AE911Truth and affiliated organizations, like our Youtube hit, Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC7