18-Language DVD Puts WTC Evidence Before the World

Mike Cook and Sandra Jelmi

Editor's Note: The Translation Team is always looking to add to its current list of supported languages. If you can help us translate into a language that we have not yet covered, or would like to join one of our existing language teams, your help would be greatly appreciated. Sign up to volunteer now!

UPDATE: You can now visit 911ExpertsSpeakOut.com to download an MP4 file IN YOUR LANGUAGE -- or download the ISO file so that you can burn your own DVD -- or simply watch and forward the trailer.

Finally, the non-English speaking world will have a chance to face the “inconvenient truth” about 9/11 with this milestone DVDJust in time for the upcoming 12th anniversary of 9/11, AE911Truth is proud to announce the release of the International Edition of “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out.” This DVD includes subtitles to allow non-English-speaking viewers to learn about the myth-shattering World Trade Center evidence from more than 40 technical and building professionals.

While the original version of Experts Speak Out was making waves a few months ago, a quiet group of volunteers around the world worked together to produce an International version, which has subtitles in no less than 18 languages. This is quite a feat, given that most producers of documentaries do not offer such a vast choice of languages, despite having more resources available.

Courageous Patriot, Scholar, and Supporter of AE911Truth

Editor's note: Dr. Bob Bowman appears in the landmark AE911Truth documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, in which he declares, “I signed that petition because the American people need the truth about 9/11." In honor of Dr. Bowman, we will keep his signature on our petition.

We were privileged to have Dr. Bob Bowman on our side. He passed away while battling cancer on August 22nd at his home in Melbourne, FL.

Dr. Robert Bowman was one of the first prominent voices to take a stand for 9/11 TruthBob earned his PhD in aeronautics and nuclear engineering at Caltech. He retired as a lieutenant colonel after 22 years in the Air Force, which included 101 missions as a fighter pilot in Vietnam. While he is best known for his role as Director of Advanced Space Programs for the Air Force during the Ford and Carter Administrations, he was also a leading critic of the “Star Wars” direction of the program during the Reagan Administration.

46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of Building 7 after Seeing Footage

On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11. In addition, after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition.

Read the full article and download the poll results at http://rethink911.org/news/new-poll-finds-most-americans-open-to-alternative-911-theories.

Editor's Note: You can find out more about this informative new documentary at 911inAcademia.com.

Coming this fall, 9/11 in the Academic Community, a winner at the University of Toronto Film Festival, is a unique film that documents academia’s treatment of critical perspectives on 9/11. It explores the taboo that has been effective in shielding the American government’s narrative of the events of 9/11 from scholarly examination. Through a powerful reflection on intellectual courage and the purpose of academia, the film aims at changing intellectual discourse on 9/11 and the War on Terror.

Will the Truth Come Out About Building 7?

By Andrew Steele and AE911Truth Staff

Editor's note: If you would like to help the 2,000+ architects and engineers at AE911Truth and other supporters in their efforts to educate the public about, and hold our elected representatives accountable for, the truth about the destruction of the World Trade Center Skyscrapers, please read about our new campaign at ReThink911.org to see what you can do.

The television station C-SPAN in Washington DC performs a great service to the American people by making members of Congress accessible to them through its morning call-in show, Washington Journal.

4. FICTITIOUS DEBRIS DAMAGE

Chris SarnsEditor’s note: To this day, most people, including many architects and engineers, are not aware that a third skyscraper, World Trade Center Building 7, mysteriously collapsed along with the World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The official report on this building’s collapse by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been challenged by many reputable and credentialed technical professionals. The NIST analysis has not undergone the rigors of scientific peer review – the typical pathway for validating significant scientific theories. Chris Sarns’ research appears in Dr. David Ray Griffin’s book titled The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7. The studies below represent years of work by Chris Sarns in unraveling some of the most glaring inconsistencies and outright frauds in the NIST report on World Trade Center 7. He demonstrates that the NIST’s theory of the fire-induced collapse of Building 7 is faulty and misleading.

The destruction of this skyscraper on September 11 was truly unprecedented in the history of high-rise buildings. More than 1,900 architects and engineers at AE911Truth are demanding a new investigation.

Chris Sarns has also been deeply involved in the work of AE911Truth, where he provides his expertise on WTC 7.

Part 1 of Chris Sarns’ report, regarding the burned-out fire in WTC7, is available here.

Part 2 of Chris Sarns' report, examining NIST's claim of thermal expansion, is available here.

Part 3 of Chris Sarns' report, examining NIST's omission of shear studs in its WTC7 analysis, is available here.

Quotes from the NIST WTC7 report are shown in "brown"

The fictitious “10-story gouge” claimed early on by NIST in WTC 7's south face is exposed.

I first noticed the conundrum that suggested that the “10-story gouge” in the side of WTC7 could not have actually existed back on September 6, 2006 while “debating” with Ryan Mackey at the JREF forum:

Conundrum in June 2004 progress report

"middle 1/4 to 1/3 width of the south face was gouged out from floor 10 to the ground"

"No heavy debris was observed in the lobby area as the building was exited, primarily white dust coating and black wires hanging from ceiling areas were observed" NIST June 2004 Progress Report, Appendix L p. 18 [pdf p. 22]

Obviously, debris large enough to create a 10-story gouge, 1/4 to 1/3 the width of the building, would have landed in the 1st floor lobby along with everything it brought down, including the 3rd floor lobby.