Denial, Projection, and Reaction Formation Taint Otherwise Perceptive Remarks by Johnson Administration Press Secretary

Bill Moyers disses 9/11 researcher/activists in a recent speech. (Photo: Grahamtastic; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)

On January 27, respected journalist Bill Moyers made a keynote speech to History Makers, described as “an organization of broadcasters and producers from around the world concerned with the challenges and opportunities faced by factual broadcasting.” Moyers made many comments with which we can all agree. Yes, “the struggle against power ‘is the struggle of memory against forgetting.’” Yes, we would all like to see more “television ‘that dignifies instead of debases’.” Yes, we would all like to see less demagoguery. And like Moyers we are discouraged by the new research findings indicating that people whose minds are made up harden their positions even further in the face of contrary information, “twist[ing] facts so they fit better with our preconceived notions.”.

AE911Truth Action Groups

San Francisco Feb 2010 Press Conference DVD

Every month our AE911Truth Action Groups meet and decide what outreach action we and our worldwide supporters will perform on behalf of our fellow citizens that are as yet unaware of the evidence for the explosive controlled demolition of the three WTC skyscrapers on 9/11. This month we’ve decided to take the AE911Truth SF Press Conference or Companion Edition DVD’s and brochures directly to architecture and engineering firms.

Onstage Debate in Boulder, Colorado: Sunday March 6, University of Colorado, 5:00 pm - University Memorial Center (UMC), Room 235

Concerned Citizen, Chris Mohr, advocate of the “natural collapse” theory

In about two weeks Richard Gage, AIA, will debate journalist Chris Mohr. The question? What brought down the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11/2001? An advocate of the “natural collapse” theory, Mohr surprised many in the 9/11 Truth movement with the depth and sincerity ofresearch into both AE911Truth’s position and the official reports in the two-hour “trial” debate on Thursday evening, February 17, which was deemed so newsworthy that it was allowed to run overtime 30 minutes into the next radio program. Listen to the podcast at INN World Report Radio for a sneak preview of the Boulder showdown.

Mohr is a journalist and has an English degree from Washington University in St. Louis, MO, where he also studied journalism extensively. Mohr is a former editor, writer and co-publisher of On The Air Magazine, a publication of the Broadcaster’s Foundation of America.

AE911Truth was the featured speaker on a 9/11 Panel at the Los Angeles Conscious Life Expo on February 12. The overall conference drew thousands of attendees curious about all manner of spiritual teachers and teachings, health products, etc. The promoters of this event wanted an opportunity for attendees to hear about the 9/11 evidence – and they got it. Richard Gage, AIA, Architect spoke first for 45 minutes and laid out all the evidence for this unusual AE911Truth audience of 356 – a much larger group than expected. Before the presentation 25 people agreed with the official conspiracy theory (OCT) of how the WTC Twin Towers came down and 43 were “unsure”. The remainder agreed with the evidence for the explosive demolition of the towers. After the multimedia presentation only one person believed the OCT and nine were “unsure”. The evidence continues to awaken people.

DC Press Conference Strikes Gold

At the age of 78, Dick Gregory has not slowed down in his quest to expose injustice and stand up for the truth

Many people know Dick Gregory as a luminary of the American civil rights movement, who partnered with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and other activists to promote racial equality and an end to the Vietnam War. Others recognize him as a popular comedian, whose humorous acts have earned him international renown. Gregory has been lauded by presidents and honored by Hollywood actors over his distinguished and diverse career… but he has set all of those accolades aside to support the work of the 9/11 truth movement – and specifically the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. We recently caught up with him to discuss the impact of this potentially historic alliance.

For Gregory, awareness of the logical fallacies behind the official 9/11 story came early. “I was suspicious of 9/11 from day one,” Gregory recalled. “The way the Twin Towers and Building 7 fell just didn’t make any sense.”

“9/11: Science & Society”
A Proud Addition to Our Online Store

This ground-breaking definitive DVD by Dr. Steven E. Jones is now available. See “Science & Society” in our online store

We are delighted to offer the most important work yet from Dr. Steven Jones, “9/11: Science & Society – A Lecture to a Worldwide University.” Recorded in Australia in November of 2009, Dr. Jones recommends this DVD as his “go to” lecture that is a culmination and synthesis of his many years of dedication to 9/11 research. See it in our online store now.

From the beginning, Dr. Jones makes it clear that he misses teaching physics at Brigham Young University (BYU) and that he is grateful for the opportunity he now has to teach to a “world-wide university” of “quizzical, critical-thinking students” who are not afraid to “take the bull by the horns”.

He also begins by explaining the peer review process by way of a controversial paper he published in 1986 in a journal called Physical Review Letters. The BYU hypothesis presented observations involving nuclear fusion that had never been seen before, and the paper was challenged by members of the scientific community. (This was not the "cold fusion" hypothesis advanced by Pons and Fleischmann, whose claims offered the very welcome but unsubstantiated promise of ultra-cheap power. Actually, Jones had earlier participated in refuting that hypothesis.) The findings of the paper were100% reproducible by experiment and thereby confirmed. This is one branch of the expected course of scientific inquiry when controversial findings are published in peer-reviewed journals: challenges are raised, experiments are conducted, and the findings are either substantiated or not. However, as Dr. Jones points out, none of his papers on the physical evidence of 9/11 have been challenged in this way. He also issues a formal challenge to other scientists to rebut any of his papers on 9/11 via the peer review process.