Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
14,000 Architects to be Challenged by the 9/11 WTC Evidence in Denver, CO
AIA National Convention, June 20–22
Speaker – Richard Gage, AIA – Friday June 21
Plus:
Muhammad Ali Center, Louisville, KY
Screens Another Challenger: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, June 20
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
San Francisco Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present in Denver on Friday, June 21, 2013, 7:00 PM, at the Colorado Convention Center (700 14th Street, Denver, CO, Room 110).
|
Weiterlesen...
|
|
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
Help 60,000 Librarians Face 9/11 Evidence
AE911Truth to Challenge American Library Association with Experts Speak Out DVD at Annual Convention, June 28 – July 1
Tuesday June 18, 2013
Written by: AE911Truth Staff
Representatives of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will be received at the 2013 American Library Association (ALA) Conference in Chicago by many curious attendees. This unique outreach event for AE911Truth extends for four days, from Friday, June 28, to Monday, July 1.The ALA exhibit hall is an integral part of the learning and professional development that takes place at the Annual Conference. It offers attendees the opportunity to explore the breadth and depth of products, services, and technologies available for today’s libraries. We will find out if Experts Speak Out is “ahead of its time.”
We will be stationed at booth #261 among 800 exhibiting organizations featuring the most up-to-date authors and educational resources. AE911Truth is pleased to participate and will feature our newest and most important documentary, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out. While this documentary is the centerpiece of our ALA outreach, it is only one of many items that we will be introducing to library staff and their supporters from across America.
Library Outreach Team Leader Wayne Coste explained the mission clearly. “We are helping Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth get Experts Speak Out into public libraries across the country,” he said.
|
Weiterlesen...
|
Geschrieben von: Chris Sarns
|
Montag, den 10. Juni 2013 um 05:01 Uhr |
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
Chris Sarns
Editor’s note: To this day, most people, including many architects and engineers, are not aware that a third skyscraper, World Trade Center Building 7, mysteriously collapsed along with the World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The official report on this building’s collapse by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been challenged by many reputable and credentialed technical professionals. The NIST analysis has not undergone the rigors of scientific peer review – the typical pathway for validating significant scientific theories. Chris Sarns’ research appears in Dr. David Ray Griffin’s book titled . The studies below represent years of work by Chris Sarns in unraveling some of the most glaring inconsistencies and outright frauds in the NIST report on World Trade Center 7. He demonstrates that the NIST’s theory of the fire-induced collapse of Building 7 is faulty and misleading.
are demanding a new investigation.
Chris Sarns has also been deeply involved in the work of , where he provides his expertise on WTC 7.
Part 1 of Chris Sarns’ report, regarding the burned-out fire in WTC7, is available here.
|
Weiterlesen...
|
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
DEBUNKING THE REAL 9/11 MYTHS:
WHY POPULAR MECHANICS CAN’T FACE UP TO REALITY
By Adam Taylor
Editor’s note: This is Part 10 of 10 (see Part 9), the conclusion of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the writers and editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of Debunking 9/11 Myths. We encourage you to submit your own reviews of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold. (Quotes from PM are shown in red and with page numbers.)
Part 10:
Minimal Wreckage to Study
More than 100,000 tons of WTC building debris was removed from Ground Zero in the three weeks following 9/11, making a proper on-site investigation impossible In the last section of their book covering WTC7, PM’s writers and editors discuss the fact that the steel from Ground Zero was quickly removed from the site and recycled. 9/11 researchers have cited this as evidence of a cover-up. However, PM’s writers attempt to explain why there was nothing unusual about this speedy cleanup of Ground Zero, and we see that, once again, their excuses are groundless.
PM starts off by quoting Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) structural engineer Gene Corley:
“There has been some concern expressed by others that the work of the team has been hampered because debris was removed from the site and has subsequently been processed for recycling,” Gene Corley told the U.S. House Representatives’ Committee on Science in March 2002. “This is not the case. The team has had full access to the scrap yards and to the site and has been able to obtain numerous samples. At this point there is no indication that having access to each piece of steel from the World Trade Center would make a significant difference to understanding the performance of the structures.” (p. 86)
|
Weiterlesen...
|
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
Announcing:
The Ad that Will Be Seen Around the World
The “metro” version of the ad is one of several that are being developed for various types of outdoor media. The highway billboard version will be much simpler. Read the fascinating story below about the design and polling of the ReThink911 ad.
|
Weiterlesen...
|
Geschrieben von: Chris Sarns
|
Mittwoch, den 22. Mai 2013 um 02:33 Uhr |
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
5-Minute ‘Spotlight On’ Segment Re-Airing this Summer!
Editor’s Note: If you see the 5-minute version of Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 on your local PBS station, please let us know. Just use the Contact Us form on our website; make sure to select “Other” In the “Subject Area” field and enter “Spotlight On” in the “Subject” field. Thanks!
AE911Truth is proud to air once again the fascinating 5-minute excerpt of Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 on PBS stations nationwide!Award-winning actor Ed Asner provides an intriguing narration to Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 that eases viewers into the astonishing evidence surrounding the skyscraper’s destruction on 9/11 This mini-documentary, narrated by Ed Asner, introduces viewers to the “collapse” of WTC Building 7 on 9/11 and includes the expert testimony of technical and building professionals. The shortened version of our Youtube hit fills in between 55-minute PBS programs such as Frontline, Masterpiece Theater, and News Hour.
The 15-minute version of the film was created for those who choose to visit the AE911Truth website. It is also the best version to share with others because it concisely demonstrates the utter falsity of the official explanation for the skyscraper’s destruction.
|
Weiterlesen...
|
Geschrieben von: Chris Sarns
|
Mittwoch, den 08. Mai 2013 um 23:51 Uhr |
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
Chris Sarns
Editor’s note: To this day most people, including many architects and engineers, are not aware that a third skyscraper, World Trade Center Building 7, mysteriously collapsed along with the World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The official report on this building’s collapse by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been challenged by many reputable and credentialed technical professionals. The NIST analysis has not undergone the rigors of scientific peer review – the typical pathway for validating significant scientific theories. Chris Sarns’ research appears in Dr. David Ray Griffin’s book titled "." The studies below represent years of work by Chris in unraveling some of the most glaring inconsistencies and outright frauds in the NIST report on World Trade Center 7. He demonstrates that the NIST’s theory of the fire-induced collapse of Building 7 is faulty and misleading.
The destruction of this skyscraper on September 11 was truly unprecedented in the history of high-rise buildings. More than 1,900 architects and engineers at are demanding a new investigation.
|
Weiterlesen...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Zurück 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Weiter > Ende >>
|