Écrit par Michael Fullerton
|
Vendredi, 18 Février 2011 17:49 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Editor's note: The following article on WTC 7, quite critical of the NIST report, appeared in the Foreign Policy Journal this week.
This year will mark the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 disaster. In these 10 years, not only have extremely important scientific questions about this tragedy gone unanswered, but they have even been ridiculed to the point of deranged absurdity. We owe a valid scientific explanation to the 3000 victims on that day, the steadily dying health-stricken first responders, the dead and wounded soldiers, and the untold thousands upon thousands of dead and injured Afghans and Iraqis resulting from the terrifying never-ending “war on terror”. Critics of those skeptical of the official story of 9/11 have often objected that an alternative theory has never been put forth. To that end, this article will put forth a scientific theory for one important aspect of the 9/11 event, the Building 7 collapse.
On September 11, 2001 a third building came down. This building was 7 World Trade Center (WTC 7), a 47-story building about the width and length of a football field. NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was tasked with officially explaining how WTC 7 fell. Their theory is documented in the report entitled Final Report of the Collapse of Building 7[1]. Many people are under the mistaken impression that NIST’s theory of how WTC 7 fell down is a valid scientific theory. In science however, a valid theory must be the simplest theory available that best explains all the available empirical data.[2] This article will show that the NIST theory is a highly convoluted theory that cannot explain important observations.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Mardi, 08 Février 2011 19:55 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Originally published on http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/ February 4, 2011
The tragedy at the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11th, 2001 continues to affect many thousands of first responders who sacrificed their own health while restoring lower Manhattan and attempting to recover survivors and victims’ remains. Recently, H.R. 847, otherwise known as the James Zadroga Bill, was signed by President Obama in an effort to provide services and compensation for those whose health was compromised through exposure to the toxic dust and gases at Ground Zero. However, these first responders also need help to understand how their illnesses originated so that improvements in treatment can be made. In response to this need, concerned citizens should consider the possible correlation between evidence for energetic materials at the WTC and the environmental exposures which appear to have caused so many illnesses in the first responders.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Lundi, 07 Février 2011 04:22 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Secretary-General and US Ambassador Call Law Professor’s Measured Remarks “Preposterous”
“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Attributed to Mahatma Gandhi
Editor’s Note: After two recent articles published by AE911Truth and a pointed response by Richard Falk and Elizabeth Woodworth, we review the flap over Falk’s comments and offer resources to help our readers keep the pressure on by expressing themselves directly to UN officials.
Appointed by the UN to the Human Rights Council, Richard Falk’s 9/11 views are under fire from the UN Secretary General |
Richard Falk, retired Princeton University professor of international law and a United Nations-appointed human rights expert on the Human Rights Council, was blasted by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon for suggesting in his January 11 blog entry that there was a cover-up regarding some aspects of the official account of 9/11. Falk mentioned “the reluctance to address the sort of awkward gaps and contradictions in the official explanations” that David Ray Griffin documents in his books. Falk also wrote, “What may be more distressing than the apparent cover-up is the eerie silence of the mainstream media … What must we learn from all this? Don’t connect dots without evidence.”
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Robert McGee
|
Lundi, 07 Février 2011 03:57 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Spread the word about AE911Truth on campus. Start or join a student group! |
This year, AE911Truth will take public outreach to the next level with the introduction of our College Outreach Team. In order to increase our presence on college campuses and reach thousands of new supporters, including students and faculty, we will set up student groups across the US and Canada. These college chapters of AE911Truth will coordinate with members of our Public Outreach Team, who will provide necessary support. One of the things we urge college groups to do is show our milestone DVD “9/11: Blueprint for Truth” on campus.
When our “Experts Speak Out” DVD is released for simultaneous showing around the world on the 10th anniversary, colleges are welcome to join in. We specifically need our supporters to staff a table at one or more registration events next August or September. Alumni, faculty or staff could do this, or at least check into it, find out the requirements, and get the additional help that you might need. Our goal at each college is having a student group registered so that student activities funds can become available. It may only take two to four students to get a group registered (depending on the college).
|
Lire la suite...
|
|
Écrit par Tom Blankers
|
Lundi, 07 Février 2011 03:33 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Bringing the Simple WTC Physics to the Public
AE911Truth take the simple WTC physics to the streets, Chico, CA |
As 9/11 activists, one of the perplexing dilemmas we must overcome is the often frustrating process of community outreach. How do we get people to actually actually come and listen to us? What are the most effective and practical ways of raising awareness about the inconsistencies in the official 9/11 account? One that I have found particularly successful is giving “street presentations.” I go to where the 9/11 newcomers are. When the objective is to spread information and awareness to as many people as possible, giving presentations “on the street” is a strong working strategy, since people experience your outreach in a familiar place they feel comfortable with. Actually you’ll be on the sidewalk, not in the middle of the street, and you may even be able to set up a small table to show your literature and DVDs to passersby.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Michael Cook
|
Dimanche, 06 Février 2011 22:40 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Los Angeles: Conscious Life Expo 2/11-2/14
Richard Gage, AIA, will give the keynote address for a star-studded panel that will expose and examine the evidence of 9/11 at the popular Conscious Life Expo in Los Angeles. This is an Expo “for open minded people”. Former Senator Mike Gravel, who represented Alaska from 1969 to 1981, will also be a panel speaker and will discuss the effort towards a California Ballot Initiative to initiate a real investigation of 9/11. Senator Gravel secured a place in history when he arranged for the “Pentagon Papers” to be entered into the Congressional Record in 1971, thus helping to end the Vietnam War. The Senator’s words at the time, “It is my constitutional obligation to protect the security of the people by fostering the free flow of information absolutely essential to their democratic decision-making” are just as applicable today.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Shawn Hamilton
|
Dimanche, 06 Février 2011 21:33 |
Il s'est passé un an depuis qu'AE911Truth a annoncé, lors d'une conférence de presse tenue à San Francisco, la compilation de 1000 signatures, toutes d'architectes et ingénieurs confirmés, appuyant les efforts conjugués pour l'obtention d'une enquête vraiment indépendante sur les événements du 11 septembre 2001 (9/11).
Shawn Hamilton, Richard Gage et Fritz Eriksen discutent des questions soulevées par 1000 Architectes et Ingénieurs devant le Marines’ Memorial Club and Hotel à San Francisco le février 19, 2010 |
Avant de me rendre à San Francisco pour couvrir l'événement, j'ignorais ce qu'était un "truther"*, mais j'allais très vite l'apprendre à mes dépends. Peu après que la version écrite de l'emission de radio que j'ai produite pour KPFA parut sur le site "Examiner.com", j'ai été accusé d'en être un. Mes tourmenteurs n'étaient pas du tout contents. Certains des commentaires les plus durs ont été proférés par des adeptes du "James Randi Educational Forum", un regroupement prônant la pensée rationnelle. Il semble que d'avoir couvert l'événement, d'avoir simplement rapporté ce qui s'était passé lors d'une conférence de presse, ait fait de moi un "truther", nom d’abord utilisé par les activistes du mouvement pour la vérité sur le 11 septembre (9/11 truth) eux-mêmes, puis adopté dans un sens très péjoratif par leurs opposants.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Dimanche, 30 Janvier 2011 22:23 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
This piece was posted to the Foreign Policy Journal on Jan 28, 2011 by Richard Falk, independent Special Rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council, in response to a series of written and verbal attacks of him by UN Secretary General and the US ambassador. It is a follow up post to our original posting of those attack pieces.
Supplemental Blog on Arizona Shootings by Richard Falk January 28, 2011
Richard Falk |
Both the UN Secretary General and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations harshly criticized some remarks in my personal blog that mentioned the 9/11 attacks. They referred to the views expressed there as ‘despicable and deeply offensive,’ ‘noxious, ‘inflammatory,’ and ‘preposterous.’ Their comments were apparently made in response to a letter written to the UN Secretary General by the head of UN Monitor, a Geneva-based highly partisan NGO, that called misleading attention to this passage in the blog. Ambassador Rice called for my dismissal from my unpaid post as an independent Special Rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council with a mandate to report upon the Israeli observance of “human rights in Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.”
|
Lire la suite...
|
Mercredi, 26 Janvier 2011 22:40 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
(Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned "preposterous" comments by a U.N.-appointed expert on Palestinian rights that there was a cover-up over the September 11 attacks, Ban's chief of staff said on Monday. The official, Vijay Nambiar, said however that it was not up to Ban to fire the expert, U.S. academic Richard Falk, as demanded by UN Watch, a Geneva-based advocacy group. Falk wrote in a blog this month that there had been an "apparent cover-up" by U.S. authorities over the September 11, 2001 attacks, in which hijackers flew airliners into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon near Washington.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Michael Cook
|
Samedi, 22 Janvier 2011 22:29 |
Modern Steel High-Rises Don’t Collapse Like a House of Cards Despite Catastrophic Damage
Ceux d'entre nous qui tentent d'exposer les preuves de la démolition contrôlée des tours du World Trade Center à un "non-initié" risquent devoir faire face à une forte résistance psychologique. Certains sont naturellement réceptifs aux démonstrations scientifiques. D'autres ne le sont pas.
Le WTC 3 sévèrement endommagé par les d´bris provenant de la tour Sud. Pas d'effrondrement total. La tour Nord tombera par-dessus sous peu. |
Il y a moyen d'amener les sceptiques à plus d'ouverture d'esprit sans faire appel à aucun détail technique, en comparant les immeubles non-effondrés du WTC aux trois tours qui ont subi une oblitération totale.Montrez les photos suivantes à votre interlocuteur, ou interlocutrice entêtés. Demandez-lui de porter son attention sur les dommages infligés par la chute des débris provenant des Tours Jumelles et de constater que de grandes portions de ces immeubles demeurent cependant debout. Demandez-lui pourquoi.
|
Lire la suite...
|
|
|
|
<< Début < Précédent 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Suivant > Fin >>
|
Page 36 sur 64 |