The Toronto Hearings Report Now Available

Get the First International Review of the 9/11 Evidence

Written by Dick Scar, BSAE

The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, took place during the 10th Anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. AE911Truth covered these astonishing hearings in our October 2011 “Blueprint” Newsletter, The official report from this landmark conference is now available.

The four-day event was held at Ryerson University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, from September 8–11, 2011. The DVD that chronicled the conference activities, titled The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception, was released in April 2012, includes over five hours of multimedia testimony and is available in the AE911Truth online store.

The 9/11 Toronto Report, authored by 9/11 researcher James Gourley, can be purchased at Amazon.com, where it is already receiving excellent reviews.

The quality of the presentations and participants at the Toronto Hearings warrants the attention of political leaders, the media, and the public…

throughout the world. Time will tell if the full potential of the Toronto Hearings is eventually fulfilled.

 

 

The objectives of the hearings were:

1. To present evidence that the U.S. government’s official investigation into the events of September 11, 2001, as pursued by various government and government-appointed agencies, is seriously flawed and has failed to describe and account for the 9/11 events.
2. To single out the most weighty evidence of the inadequacy of the U.S. government’s investigation; to organize and classify that evidence; to preserve that evidence; to make that evidence widely known to the public and to governmental, non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations.
3. To submit a record and a summary of the hearings, together with signed Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant governments, groups and international agencies with the request that a full and impartial investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001, which have been used to initiate military invasions and to restrict the rights of citizens.
4. To engage the attention of the public, the international community and the media through witness testimony as well as through media events broadcasted via the Internet during the four day event.

In 2011, experts and scientists from around the world gathered in Toronto, Canada to present new and established evidence that questions the official story of 9/11. This evidence was presented to a distinguished panel of experts over a 4 day period.

Representatives of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the 9/11 Commission, and the U.S. government bodies who produced the official reports for these agencies were invited several times to participate in the hearings, but declined to do so.

Sixteen expert witnesses, including AE911Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, presented both direct and logical evidence to an international panel of four prominent and credible individuals who agreed to look at the evidence objectively and decide whether it deserves wider consideration. The panel members were Ferdinando Imposimato, the Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy; Herbert Jenkins, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Canada's McMaster University; Richard B. Lee, University Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at the University of Toronto; and David Johnson, Professor Emeritus of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Tennessee.

The hearings included a comprehensive look at 9/11 from many angles. Several subjects beyond the focus of AE911Truth were covered. Many of the events on that day were coined “State Crimes Against Democracy” (SCADs) by expert witness Lance deHaven-Smith, PhD, as he presented an analysis of a range of SCADs throughout US and world history.

The panel members provided a serious, intelligent critique of the evidence presented. Several possible investigation venues were discussed, as well as possible outcomes from a real, unimpeachable investigation of the events of 9/11, which would include subpoena power and testimony taken under oath.

“ Was the destruction of the World Trade Center a “State Crime Against Democracy”? ”

Many months after the hearings, the four panel members produced a document with the following conclusions and recommendations:

 

• The 9/11 attacks were “crimes against humanity.”
• Besides the attacks themselves, the crimes of official malfeasance or dereliction of duty and cover up of criminal acts need to be identified and prosecuted.
• The official reports have failed to provide a satisfactory explanation of the events of 9/11/01. NIST, the 9/11 Commission, and the Joint Congressional Inquiry gave incomplete, unscientific and subjective accounts of the events.
• A tacit admission that the official reports are false would be the fact that there has been no substantial change in building codes based on the official claims as to cause of building failures due to fire.
• The omissions of relevant evidence in the NIST investigation and the investigation of the Pentagon require an impartial, independent, scientific investigation group to determine the real cause of destruction. The possibility of controlled demolition would have to be explicitly investigated by such a group.
• An independent investigation is needed with subpoena power to determine the level of involvement and culpability on the part of CIA and FBI personnel.
• The International Criminal Court could have jurisdiction over the crimes of 9/11 because 1) crimes against humanity were committed and 2) the case has not been investigated or prosecuted by the USA or any other country that has jurisdiction over it.

 

The 438-page 9/11 Toronto Report is one of the most complete, yet concise, summaries of the best 9/11 evidence collected so far. It makes the critical issues crystal clear. The 330-minute DVD, The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception, brings the hearings to life by taking the best parts of the presentations and making them available to the public in an easily viewed format.

For more information, see The Toronto Hearings page on Facebook and Twitter@TorontoHearings.