ALERT: US State Department Cannot Afford Professional Advice on WTC Destruction
Print
E-mail
Written by John-Michael P. Talboo   
Friday, 03 December 2010 20:34

Federal Government Website Offers Amateur Video
by Student as Authoritative Analysis

A new report has been released by the State Department website America.Gov in an effort to debunk the physical and forensic evidence presented by the technical professionals of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and others. The report was made possible by the Science Fellowship Program, which gives an “opportunity for a scientist to contribute scientific and technical expertise to the Department.”

Not really.

In actuality the website posted a page purporting to debunk the evidence for controlled demolition on 9/11 just shortly after the publication of the peer-reviewed paper “Active Thermitic Materials Discovered in Dust from 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.”

The website recommends the long since debunked reports published by demolition photographer Brent Blanchard and Popular Mechanics. Even more striking, it suggests that visitors watch the YouTube video “9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible” posted September 02, 2007 by Ryan Owens

Read more...
 
Geraldo and “BuildingWhat?”: The Story Behind the Story
Print
E-mail
Written by Eli Rika   
Friday, 03 December 2010 19:30
Geraldo Rivera, Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti

Many AE911Truth supporters have heard about recent coverage of the “BuildingWhat?” campaign on the Fox News show Geraldo At Large.

On November 13, Geraldo Rivera interviewed 9/11 victim family member Bob McIlvaine and mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti about the destruction of WTC Building 7. During the show Geraldo played the “BuildingWhat?” TV ad – previously seen only on the Internet and on TV in the New York Metropolitan Area – to a broad nationwide audience.

Read more...
 
WTC Investigation Warnings from Editor of Fire Engineering Magazine - Jan 1, 2002
Print
E-mail
Written by Editor   
Friday, 26 November 2010 22:45

The Editor in Chief of Fire Engineering Magazine, Bill Manning, cast dire warnings of malpractice and conflicts of interest in the official WTC investigations and destruction of evidence in the aftermath of the Twin Tower's collapse.  In hindsight, this man was well ahead of his time.  We quote him liberally in our 2-hour research edition of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth.

See Bill Manning's article "$elling Out The Investigation" on fireengineering.com

 
FOX TV's Judge Napolitano Interviews Geraldo Rivera About Controversial Segment on WTC 7
Print
E-mail
Saturday, 20 November 2010 20:55

"It's hard for me to believe [WTC 7] came down by itself...[9/11] couldn't possibly have been done the way the government told us."

- Andrew Napolitano on the show Infowars
November 23, 2010

Here is FOX TV's Judge Napolitano interviewing Geraldo Rivera on Friday 11/19/10 asking Geraldo about his very controversial segment on WTC 7 with Bob McIlvaine & Tony Szamboti on his show the week before.

 
FOX TV's Geraldo impressed by "1,300 Architects and Engineers" for 9/11 Truth
Print
E-mail
Written by BuildingWhat.org   
Tuesday, 16 November 2010 17:48

"What caught my eye is their claim (BuildingWhat? campaign) that more than 1,300 architects and engineers examined the evidence about Building 7 and disagree with the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology."

- Geraldo Rivera,  Fox News
November 13, 2010

“BuildingWhat?” Appears on Geraldo At Large on FOX News

"READ MORE" to see AE911Truth's response to Mr. Rivera at the end of this post

On November 13, Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti appeared on Geraldo Rivera's show "Geraldo At Large" on Fox News to talk about the "BuildingWhat?" TV ad campaign and World Trade Center Building 7 for a short segment.

Bob McIlvaine lost his son Bobby McIlvaine on September 11, 2001. He is an active member of NYC CAN, a group that co-sponsors the "BuildingWhat?" TV ad campaign. Tony Szamboti is a mechanical engineer and signer of the petition at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group of more than 1,350 professionals calling for a new independent investigation into the destruction of Building 7 and the twin towers.

What do New Yorkers think about Building 7?

Read more...
 
Colorado Democrats Call for New 9/11 Investigation: An Insider Tells Us How They Did It
Print
E-mail
Written by Frances Shure, Colorado 9/11 Visibility   
Tuesday, 09 November 2010 19:04

It’s true! The Democratic Platform for the state of Colorado is the first major party in the US to adopt a resolution for a new investigation into the official story of the events surrounding 9/11.

It started in 2004 when I, a complete novice in political processes, decided to participate in my precinct caucus in order to try to make a difference here in Colorado.1 The night before, I learned that the caucus is also a time to bring policy resolutions for consideration. Hurriedly, I wrote a resolution for a new, independent investigation into 9/11, figuring that here is an opportunity, at least, to educate a few more people. To my surprise, my precinct caucus neighbors voted for it!

Read more...
 
Lack of Deceleration of North Tower’s Upper Section Proves Use of Explosives
Print
E-mail
Monday, 08 November 2010 16:46

Many people who think they have been keeping up with the revelations of the last several years about the destruction of the three high-rises in New York City on Sept. 11, 2001, will nonetheless be surprised to discover that the falling upper section of WTC 1 exhibited no measurable deceleration when it impacted the lower section. This is a startling revelation because it adds to the collection of “smoking guns” proving that the “collapse” of that building was not caused by the jetliner impact and ensuing fires.

Although theoretically possible, collapses of heavily constructed buildings like the Twin Towers and WTC 7 had never occurred prior to Sept. 11, 2001, without some form of “assistance.” The reason for this is that they are built with significant reserve strength. The construction of each floor is designed to support several times the actual load above it.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Next > End >>