The 10th anniversary of 9/11 presents a unique opportunity to reach millions of people by writing letters to the editor on a massive scale. The subject matter is ripe for discussion, and newspaper editors will be obliged to print many of our letters. Join this grassroots campaign that is underway now! Our goal is to generate 1,000 submissions in the next few days.

Almost all newspapers have online submission forms for convenience. Most public forums allow for 250 or 300 words, but some have a 200-word limit. Simply copy one of the following letters into the online submission form of your newspaper and submit. Spread it on Facebook as well!
Example 1 by Lynn Bradbury

Former Reagan administration official Dr. Paul Craig Roberts recently wrote an essay titled, "9/11 After a Decade: Have We Learned Anything?" In this paper, he reminds us that the 9/11 Commission's own chairmen, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, said it was "set up to fail." Senior counsel John Farmer, Jr., wrote that the US government made "a decision not to tell the truth about what happened."

Most questions from the 9/11 families weren't answered. Important and expert witnesses weren't called. Roberts called the commission a "controlled political operation composed of politicians instead of experts, which only heard from supporters of the government's account. It was not an investigation of events and evidence."

Senator Max Cleland resigned, retaining integrity by not participating in a "compromised investigation."

Please support the petition for a real investigation, as have 1500 architects and engineers and over 10,000 others, at AE911Truth.org. Watch their DVD trailer for "Experts Speak Out", which details the controlled demolition of the THREE WTC towers. Watch the ad featuring 9/11 family members, first responders, and others at RememberBuilding7.org.

Example 2 by Dick Scar

September marks the 10th anniversary of 9/11/01. During the intervening decade, scientific evidence has been mounting that points to controlled demolition as the cause for the collapse of World Trade Center (WTC) Buildings 1 & 2 (the Twin Towers) and Building 7. Over 1500 architects and engineers at AE911Truth plus over 12,000 other people have signed a petition demanding a new investigation into the destruction of these buildings. Every member of Congress has been given the petition and evidence.

The official story defies the video evidence and the laws of physics. In their 2007 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, the Co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, state that they believe the Commission was "set up to fail". In the interest of national security, Congress should support a new, independent investigation with subpoena power to finally get to the truth.

Example 3 by Bernie Suarez

“They actually passed a new law that gives us (NIST) the authority, a more comprehensive authority to carry out this kind of building and fire safety investigation” –This is a quote from S. Shyam Sunder of National Institute of Standards and Technology regarding its private data and investigation of the destruction of the WTC towers on 9/11.

Putting Mr. Sunder’s statement in perspective, this is an admission that NIST gave itself the permission to violate the basic principles of the scientific method! Unfortunately for Sunder and NIST, in science one cannot just declare that one’s scientific results don’t need to abide by the scientific method. This striking reality has allowed the cover-up of arguably the greatest crime scene on American soil.

Here we are, ten years after 9/11, and the thing that astounds me the most is the decision that the mass media and politicians made to collectively ignore, down-play, obscure and even demonize the most basic scientific reproducible evidence that shows that three WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition. They have chosen to side instead with NIST’s computer model analysis that is not based on reproducible science but on secret computer model data.

The destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7 – which was not hit by a plane -- shows in every case, sudden, symmetric, sequential and rapid destruction, with superheated temperatures confirmed by physical, instrumental, photographic and even testimonial evidence.

The evidence that irrefutably disproves the official story has mounted ‘like a mountain’ 10 years later, yet the majority of the media continues to ignore it. Please take a stand and consider the evidence that over 1500 architects and engineers firmly stand behind. Review the evidence that AE911Truth has exposed and decide for yourself. The experts have spoken!

Example 4 by Eli Rika

How many skyscrapers fell on September 11, 2001?

Everyone knows about the Twin Towers, but what about Building 7?

Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper in the WTC complex that came down at 5:20PM on September 11. Even though it was not hit by an airplane, it fell to the ground in 6.5 seconds, 2.5 of which were at free fall acceleration – as fast as a bowling ball being dropped from the side of the building.

How does that happen without explosives being used?

Over 1500 architects and engineers have joined family members of the 9/11 victims in calling for an independent investigation into the explosive destruction of the THREE WTC skyscrapers. Join the Remember Building 7 campaign and the experts at AE911Truth who are demanding answers. The future of our nation depends on it.