RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign
Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe
Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Proudly Announces:
THIS IS THE YEAR WE MAKE IT HAPPEN!
In spite of the fact that the 9/11 truth message has been censored by many in the media, ignored by Congress and the President, and shunned by most academic institutions, polls still show that more than 30% of US citizens doubt the official story about 9/11. Let’s reach out to the rest!
The terrifying specter of drone strikes on US civilians, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the National Defense Authorization Act… these are just a few disturbing consequences that continue to follow widespread acceptance of the official 9/11 narrative.
Écrit par Chris Sarns, Richard Gage, AIA, and Gregg Roberts
Mercredi, 13 Mars 2013 23:45
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
No. The NIST WTC 7 computer animation of the collapse does not even remotely resemble the observations and actual video footage of the destruction in three main ways. A scientifically valid explanation of any phenomenon must account for the key observations.Moreover, a computer simulation does not constitute an explanation. It is merely a tool for determining and visualizing what might have happened if various assumptions are true.
NIST has refused to disclose the computer inputs of its mathematical models. This makes it impossible for anyone to check their work.
1. While NIST admits publicly that the building descended at “free-fall” acceleration, its computer simulation is not consistent with a building that is coming down in free fall.
NIST’s Final Report on the collapse of WTC 7 (NCSTAR 1A, p. 45) states that gravitational acceleration (free-fall) of the main roofline occurred. It began when the point NIST was using [1] as its marker on the video had descended about 7 feet*. In Figure 12-62 (NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.2 p. 588) the roofline has descended about 10m /33 feet (NCSTAR 1-9A, p. 77) and the columns are still buckling in an irregular manner. Buckling columns provide resistance and would obviously prevent the building from collapsing at free-fall acceleration. The NIST computer model is clearly not simulating free-fall acceleration.
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Editor’s Note: This article chronicles the ongoing efforts by Canadian 9/11 Truth activists to persuade their members of Parliament to call for a new 9/11 investigation. If you’d like to take part in this crucial campaign, send an email to Mike Bondi and tell him you want to help!
Vancouver East MP Libby Davies became the first federal representative to call for a new 9/11 inquiry in the Canadian Parliament
Canadian AE911Truth supporters are making the best of a unique opportunity that their government provides for obtaining a real 9/11 investigation. The petition process grants all Canadians the right to petition Parliament – but as we discovered, this can be an uphill battle.
The general principle is that any Canadian may petition Parliament directly in a matter that cannot be resolved any other way. The first step is to create the petition and have it certified to be “in order” by the Clerk of Petitions. Once this is done, at least 25 signatures must be gathered.
Parliamentary rules do not allow unelected citizens to be on the floor of Parliament. A Member of Parliament (MP) needs to agree to physically deliver a particular petition to the clerk’s desk inside Parliament.
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Recent and Upcoming Events Bring AE911Truth to San Francisco, Las Vegas and Atlanta
AE911Truth has important events planned for just about every month in 2013. If you feel the need of an AE911Truth presence to “light a fire” in your city, just let us know. Your support will enable us to visit your area and inform your community about the explosive 9/11 evidence.
RECENT EVENTS…
January 11, 2013: St Mary’s College – Moraga, CA
AE911Truth rang some bells in this sleepy St. Mary’s campus with the help of a no-holds-barred activist professor
Professor Albert Dragstedt, from the Classics department of St. Mary’s College, asks us each year to teach a 2½-hour class in the special January session course that he has created called “9/11 Studies”. It’s all about what really happened on 9/11, which is quite illuminating to the students, most of whom are caught unaware. Many guest speakers have provided their insight, including William Veale, the attorney for April Gallop; Mickey Huff of Project Censored; James Hoffman of 911Research.com; and Paul Rea, author of “Mounting Evidence”. It is also refreshing to have a course in today’s colleges whose required reading includes David Ray Griffin’s “Pearl Harbor Revisited”!
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
The 95-minute Experts Speak Out DVD in paper sleeves is now available in bulk at rock-bottom prices
Our blockbuster DVD, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, is now available in paper sleeves from the AE911Truth online store at bulk prices as low as $1.50 each!
AE911Truth has produced and distributed many DVDs since its founding, but none have had more impact than Experts Speak Out. After the Final Edition was released in May 2012, Director Richard Gage, AIA, and other 9/11 experts presented nationwide screenings of the video during a 32-city world premiere tour.
Experts Speak Out made its broadcast TV premiere on Colorado Public TV in September, 2012. It soon soared to become the #1 watched and shared film on PBS.org, even beating out the popular drama, Downtown Abbey. The video has received more than one million views on PBS.org, and there are currently at least a dozen other PBS stations interested in airing it this year. Others are likely to join the list, due to the active outreach efforts by AE911Truth supporters.
Écrit par Wayne Coste, P.E., with contributing editor Eli Rika
Vendredi, 08 Mars 2013 23:02
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Will Amy Goodman Break the 9/11 Media Silence?
Is Amy Goodman part of the “silent majority” when it comes to questioning the official 9/11 story?
For a journalist, when something cannot be said, the silence is the most important story. Many people believe that Amy Goodman, host of the popular public radio and TV show Democracy Now!, is among the best when it comes to confronting people in power and asking hard questions. She may be one of the best, but her silence about 9/11 is stunning. For example, she has yet to tell her audience or her readers that nearly 2,000 architects and engineers – all verified and vetted – are calling for a new investigation of the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11, citing evidence of controlled demolition. That should be headline news for a journalist whose self-described role is to report on alternative voices excluded by the mainstream media.
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Jane Pollicino’s passionate calls for justice helped bring millions of people into an awareness of the compelling 9/11 evidence
9/11 widow Jane Pollicino, a passionate supporter of AE911Truth, passed away on February 21 after suffering a stroke, according to Newsday.
Her husband, Steve Pollicino, died in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Her husband’s remains were never found.
Jane was an active member of NYC CAN, joining over 100 family members of 9/11 victims and first responders who stand side by side with the 1,700 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in calling for a real 9/11 investigation.
In 2009, she helped deliver a petition signed by over 80,000 New Yorkers to the New York City Council in an effort to begin a new 9/11 inquiry.
In 2011, she took part in the second TV ad by the Remember Building 7 campaign, in which 9/11 victims’ family members joined architects and engineers in questioning the destruction of WTC Building Seven.
Editor’s Note: For more information about Tony Rooke’s court case and to find out how you can get involved in future efforts, send Tony an email. You can also listen to Tony’s radio interview on 9/11 Free Fall.
In an act of civil disobedience, Tony Rooke refused to pay a £130 TV license fee, alleging that the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks. Facing a judge Monday, Rooke was not convicted and did not have to pay the fine.
Rooke, a documentary maker who made his protest against the BBC in Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex, claims the BBC reported that World Trade Center 7 collapsed “due to an office fire, which, even the NIST Report says, fell at free-fall speed for eight floors in 2.5 seconds. That is absolutely impossible without a controlled demolition being involved.”
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
How to Handle False Arguments Used to Reject the WTC Evidence
Editor’s Note: New York attorney Dennis McMahon spearheaded the legal effort by NYC CAN in 2009 to compel the New York City Council to initiate a new investigation of the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. If you would like to support legal actions toward a real 9/11 investigation, write to Gregg Roberts.
It can be challenging for advocates in the 9/11 Truth movement to get our message across to family, friends, and strangers alike. Even when we are able to find an audience not too distracted by electronic devices, work, or their favorite sports team's latest performance, all too often the responses we get amount to false arguments. By having ready, effective ways to respond to the various types of false arguments, you can break through the denial and have greater success in educating those around you.
Fran Shure, M.A., and other psychologists featured in Experts Speak Out explained why some people have a negative reaction to 9/11 Truth
Often, the negative responses to the evidence presented by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have a subtext that could be fairly titled, “kill the messenger.” Why do so many people respond this way? As discussed by psychology experts, one explanation involves the issue of “nationalist faith.” What this entails, for certain Americans, is the steadfast view that the U.S. government is always “the good guy,” and that anyone not in sync with this view is “anti-American” and not to be trusted. Those who blindly cling to nationalist faith simply cannot entertain the idea that America’s leaders would do anything wrong.
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Join our Phone Team and Get Rewarded in the Process!
Want to help us achieve a new investigation, but you're not a technical person or a writer? You can still support the mission of AE911Truth in a big way by calling our petition signers and asking them to become members.
How does this work? You simply get on the phone with our exciting phone team every Monday at 3:00 pm Pacific time from the comfort of your own home. (If you have a conflict with this timeframe, you can make calls at times that fit your schedule.)
Nervous about making fund-raising calls? Just about everybody is! That's why we have a serious incentive program to reward you for exercising courage in this all-important way.
Once you break the ice, you find that almost all of our supporters are happy to get a call from us.
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples
WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:
Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed
As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:
The three high-rises exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:
Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Flickr
Youtube
Facebook
Twitter
Vancouver East MP Libby Davies became the first federal representative to call for a new 9/11 inquiry in the Canadian Parliament
AE911Truth rang some bells in this sleepy St. Mary’s campus with the help of a no-holds-barred activist professor
Is Amy Goodman part of the “silent majority” when it comes to questioning the official 9/11 story?
Jane Pollicino’s passionate calls for justice helped bring millions of people into an awareness of the compelling 9/11 evidence 
Fran Shure, M.A., and other psychologists featured in Experts Speak Out explained why some people have a negative reaction to 9/11 Truth 
