9/11: Explosive Evidence -
Experts Speak Out - Trailer
Duration: 4:09
9/11: Explosive Evidence
Experts Speak Out
Free 1-hour version
| CrossTalk on 9/11: Whodunit? |
 |
 |
| News - News Releases By AE911Truth | |||
| Thursday, 11 March 2010 00:00 | |||
|
From Russia Today, originally posted on YouTube In this edition of CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle asks his guests (Annie Machon, Ian Henshall, Richard Gage, AIA) why discussion of the events of 9/11 continue to attract so much attention but is all but banned in the media mainstream. >
|
Steven Dusterwald
37-Year S.E. Structural Engineer
What caught my attention was the rapid failure of connections that had to happen in order for Building 7 to come down at the rate that it did.
Robert McCoy
High-Rise Architect
I signed the petition for AE911Truth because I felt it was an organization that was trying to get at the truth of what actually brought those buildings down on 9/11.
Roland Angle
P.E., Civil/Structural Engineer
What really concerns me is we're beginning to live in a society that is rebellious against science. It's important that all of us with the technical expertise speak out on the 9/11 issue.
Kamal Obeid
S.E. Structural Engineer
Structural engineers and other building professionals need to understand that these buildings did not fail the way they are claimed to have failed.
Dan Barnum
FAIA, High-Rise Architect
The tops of the buildings were basically disintegrated.
Anthony Szamboti
B.S.M.E., Mechanical Engineer
The tons of molten metal under just the three WTC buildings that collapsed made me realize that what we're being told about how they collapsed is false.
Gery Warner
P.E. Mechanical Engineer
Molten aluminum is silver. It looks like mercury. The molten metal pouring out of the South Tower is indicative of molten iron, not aluminum.
Flickr
Youtube
Facebook
Twitter