left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    Are You New to the Evidence? Print E-mail
    Written by AE911Truth Staff   
    Friday, 01 August 2014 02:57

    Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    Below is a summary of information that we feel you need to know regarding the events of September 11, 2001, in New York City.

    AE911Truth has carefully studied the publicly available information on the destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7. This evidence includes video and audio recordings, photographs, eyewitness accounts, and physical evidence.

    As building and technical professionals, we research and comment on only this forensic and recorded evidence, which has led us to the inevitable conclusion that the three skyscrapers were willfully destroyed by controlled demolition using explosives and incendiaries. That is why we have concluded that the hypotheses for the buildings' destruction given in the official reports published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, an arm of the U.S. government, are seriously flawed and scientifically impossible.

     


     

    On this page you will find...

     

     


     

     

    The Evidence

     

     AE911Truth's - Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction (33-min. version)

    This 33-min. version of the original two-hour AE911Truth film, presented by Richard Gage, AIA, takes the viewer through the most of  the scientific evidence that proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the destruction of the World Trade Center was accomplished with explosive controlled demolition.

     

    Explosive Testimony

     

    Physicist Jeff Farrer is one of the scientists who found thermite in the World Trade Center dust. He discusses his process of discovery using the scientific method.

    Total Time: Approx. 45 min.

     
       
    Physicist Steven Jones is also one of the scientists who found thermite inside the World Trade Center's dust. Chain of custody of the WTC dust and nanothermite are discussed in depth.

    Total time: Approx. 30 min.

     
       
    Chemical Engineer Mark Basile is another scientist who found thermite in the World Trade Center dust.

    Total Time: Approx. 14 min.

     

     

     These and other experts are featured in our latest documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" 

    The one hour version of the film is below...

     

     

     

    Physics - WTC7 Free-fall


    Physics teacher David Chandler uses simple scientific software to understand and show the free-fall demolition of World Trade Center Building 7

     

     

     

    'The North Tower Exploding'

    An examination of the North Tower exploding

     

     

    'Downward Acceleration of the North Tower'

    David Chandler's exploration of the downward acceleration of WTC 1

     

     

    WTC 7: NIST Finally Admits Free-fall (Part I)

    In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at free-fall, but the cover-up was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged free-fall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. This video displays the brazenness of the NIST WTC7 cover-up.

     

     

     

    See the rest of the videos in this series at the links below:

     

    NIST Admits Free-fall Part II (5:40 min)

     

    NIST Admits Free-fall Part III (10:17 min)

     


     

     

    9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

    Jonathan Cole tackles the thermate debate. Can thermate actually cut steel or is National Geographic's 9/11 show correct?

     

     


     

    118 Witnesses:  Firefighters Testify to
    Explosions in the Twin Towers

    Reminder: This YouTube video is not an AE911Truth video, and AE911Truth takes no position on who is responsible for the 9/11/01 attacks.

     

     

     


     

    When a small team of independent researchers can discover major discrepancies and careless errors throughout what should have been the most critical and carefully reviewed part of the entire report, then what confidence should anyone have in the rest of that report, or NIST's other reports about what happened on 9/11? 

     

    Part One — Shear Ignorance

     

     

    Part Two — The Expanding Lie

     

     

     

    Part Three-- Tangled Webs

     

     

     

    Part Four-- MaladmiNISTration

     

     


    Technical Articles

     

    Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
      By Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, and others

    Why The Red/Gray Chips Are Not Primer Paint
      By Niels H. Harrit

    Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
      By Jim Hoffman

    Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
      By Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones

    Mysteries of the Twin Towers
     By R. Herbst

    The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
      By Dr. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, M.E.

    Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
      By 16 scientists, scholars, architects, and engineers

    Public comments on the NIST WTC 7 draft report. Submitted to NIST 09/11/08.
      By Jonathan Cole, P.E.

    Journal of Engineering Mechanics:  Discussion of "Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis" by K.A. Seffen
     By Dr. Crockett Grabbe

    Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Stories of WTC 1
      By Gordon Ross Journal of 9/11 Studies

    Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
      By Dr. Crockett Grabbe

    Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
      By Kevin Ryan, B.S. Chem. - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager

    Physical Chemistry of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Alum-Rich Microspheres at Demise of WTC 1 & 2
      By Jerry Lobdill

    The Destruction of WTC 7
      By Vesa Raiskila

    The NIST WTC Investigation -- How Real Was The Simulation?
      By Eric Douglas, Architect

    Revisiting 9/11/2001 -- Applying the Scientific Method
      By Prof. Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., Physics

    DR. BAZANT - NIST's 911 FALL GUY
      By Gordon Ross, ME

    Open Letter to Purdue President France Córdova
      By Kevin Ryan, B.S. Chem. - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager

    Jones vs. Robertson: A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
      By Gregg Roberts

    Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses
      By William Rice, P.E.

    Can Physics Rewrite History?
      By Chuck Thurston

    Reply to Protec's "A critical analysis of the collapse of WTC towers 1, 2 & 7 from an explosives and conventional demolition industry viewpoint"
      By Jim Hoffman

    NIST's World Trade Center FAQ: A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
      By Jim Hoffman

    Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century
      By Jim Hoffman

    The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True
      By Dr. David Ray Griffin

    Another reason the 9/11 fire-mediated collapse theory is wrong
      By Joseph Smith

    Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth
      BY Jim Hoffman

    Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
      By Dr. Steven E. Jones

    Proof That The Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient to Melt Steel in the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center on 9/11/01
      By Terry Morrone

    Report on Weidlinger Simulation
      By Leaked WTC Blueprints contain 3D simulations from the Weidlinger report that contradict the NIST report of the Twin Tower's destruction

    Engineering News Record: The World Trade Center

    Bad Science: Keith Seffen And The WTC 'Collapse'
      By Winter Patriot

    UK Engineer: WTC 'Collapses' Were 'A Very Ordinary Thing'
      By Winter Patriot

    Explosions or Collapse? The Semantics of Deception and the Significance of Categories
      By C. Thurston

    My Response to Ryan Mackey and the Self-Crushing Building Theory, "On Debunking 9/11 Debunking"
      By Chuck Thurston

    High Velocity Bursts of Debris from Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers
      By Kevin Ryan, B.S. Chem. - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager

    Response to NIST on Control Demolition Investigation Failure
      By Dr. Crockett Grabbe

    Response to NIST on Energy and Momentum
      By Dr. Crockett Grabbe

    Collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center
      By Dr. Crockett Grabbe

    Science in the Bush: When Politics Displaces Physics
      By Dr. Crockett Grabbe and Lenny Charles

    9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation Was Impossible
      By Frank Legge, PhD & Tony Szamboti, Mechanical Engineer

    Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous
      By Mick Meany

    Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
      By Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel  Farnsworth and Crockett Grabbe

    Engineer Sees Evidence of Extreme Temperatures in WTC Steel
      By Shoestring

    The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers
      By Tony Szamboti, ME

    The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
      By Kevin Ryan, B.S. Chem. - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager

    Response to “Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis” by K.A. Seffen
      By Dr. Crockett Grabbe

    How the Towers were Demolished
      By Gordon Ross

    How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
      By Andrea Dreger

     


     

    Other Information

     

    World Trade Center Blueprints

    World Trade Center Tower A Architectural Drawings

    29 Structural/Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Destruction of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11, June '09

    Republic Magazine — Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of World Trade Center, Building 7 on 9/11, Sept '09

    Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, 2009

    Thermite: The Smoking Gun, Sept '09

    World Trade Center Tower A Electrical Drawings

     


     

    "But Hasn't Popular Mechanics debunked this?"

     

    No. 

    One of the reasons we frequently hear for why people do not look further into the evidence of controlled demolition on 9/11 is because they have heard that the evidence has been "debunked" by Popular Mechanics.   AE911Truth has developed a series of articles that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by Popular Mechanics in the latest edition of its book, Debunking 9/11 Myths.

    Debunking the Real 9/11 Myths - Why Popular Mechanics Can't Face up to Reality