left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    Skeptical Inquirer Publishes Two Letters from AE911Truth Supporters About 9/11 Truth Hit Piece Print E-mail
    Wednesday, 04 May 2011 22:36

    As part of the introduction to letters about "The Conspiracy Meme" the editor talks about the letters he received, most of which just asserted that 9/11 was done with explosives. These two were selected "nearly randomly" from the 30 plus received.

    "As a registered professional engineer committed to the scientific method, I would like to echo Ted Goertzel's support for the peer-review process. Goertzel says, "review panels must have full access to all datasets ... It is especially important that ... qualified specialists [have] an opportunity to present alternative views ... " Engineers who observe the destruction of WTC 7 as possible only by controlled demolition have been stifled by the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) decision to suppress details of their WTC 7 failure models. For example, NIST replied: "Indeed the NIST Director has determined that the release of 3,370 files from the [failure] analysis results ... might jeopardize public safety and therefore, these files have been withheld." Suppressing this analysis from peer review is unconscionable. Public safety is endangered when engineers are precluded from studying how an ordinary office fire could completely and utterly destroy a forty-seven-story modem skyscraper such that for more that 100 feet it exhibited free-fall acceleration. Goertzel notes, "technological conspiracies often ... [make] bizarre claims that ... [information is] suppressed. In this case, it is not a bizarre claim but rather a bizarre reality. We welcome Goertzel's, and SKEPTICAL INQUIRER's, public call for NIST to release its suppressed analysis."

    Wayne H. Coste, P.E., Petition Signer, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

    "The cover of the January/February 2011 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER is excellent. The drawing and the conspiracy theory formula suit very well what is arguably the grandest contemporary conspiracy: 9/11. Alas, the article itself gets 9/11 all wrong, peremptorily implying that the official "Osama fanatics brought down the Twin Towers with their hijacked jets" theory would be an irrefutable fact. This casts an ominous shadow on the whole article as well as the value of the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER's contributions in the field of parapsychology, where evidence is much more subtle than in the case of the Twin Towers. I strongly encourage you to include in your next edition a solid article on the official 9/11 conspiracy theory with a section on the amply demonstrated controlled demolition of the Twin Towers. Anything less will establish the respectable SKEPTICAL INQUIRER as another agent in 9/11 censorship and an accomplice in the fear, the wars, the economic meltdown, and the neglect of pressing worldwide problems that the 9/11 hysteria has generated."

    Dan Noel, Costa Mesa, California

    See a PDF of the letters as published in Skeptical Inquirer.

    Read AE911Truth's article about this issue of Skeptical Inquirer:
    Skeptical Inquirer Attacks 9/11 Truth Movement, Avoids Vast Body of Scientific Evidence