→ Download letter #3 from AE911Truth to AIA Board & General Counsel
→ Download WTC Evidence Summary to AIA
Did you know... 3 skyscrapers were destroyed on 9/11?
WTC 7:
|
|
a 47-story high-rise NOT hit by a plane, yet fell in just under 7 seconds.
|
Do you honestly think the failure of a single column could cause a steel-framed skyscraper to collapse in this manner? … But that is indeed the official explanation:
NIST: “Collapse… by normal office fires.”
Or do you Trust your eyes, the facts, and the laws of physics?
|
The evidence for explosive controlled demolition is overwhelming.
|
Top AIA members and (1,700 other architects & engineers) including a dozen high-rise architects and 6 dozen structural engineers want an unimpeachable investigation:
Harry G. Robinson III, FAIA
"The collapse was too symmetrical to have been eccentrically generated. The destruction was symmetrically initiated to cause the buildings to implode as they did."
|
Daniel B. Barnum, FAIA
"I have ‘known’ from day-one that the buildings were imploded and that they could not and would not have collapsed from the damage caused by the airplanes that ran into them."
|
Paul Stevenson Oles, FAIA
"There appear too many unexplained events and unverified circumstances to be satisfied with the official version of the New York building collapses… a thorough and impartial investigation by an independent, well-funded commission is fully merited."
|
Kevin A. Kelly, FAIA
"The presentation made by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth at the AIA convention in San Francisco made a sufficient case that a new investigation into the collapses of the 3 high rise buildings on 9/11/01 would be worthwhile."
|
Eason Cross, FAIA
"The third building evidence is truly troubling. The 'why' is very hard to comprehend."
|
David Paul Helpern, FAIA
"The speed and symmetry of the collapses are not consistent with the damage. A new investigation is needed."
|
Come see us in Denver at Booth #1355
|
|
9/11: Re-examining the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers
|