Schutz der Öffentlichkeit vor Informationen

9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign

Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe

Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

Architects & Engineers:
Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner

9/11: Explosive Evidence -
Experts Speak Out - Trailer
Duration: 4:09

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

9/11: Explosive Evidence
Experts Speak Out
Free 1-hour version

FOX TV, Fresno,
with Richard Gage, AIA

CBC - The Fifth Estate
"The Unofficial Story"

The Reality Report
with Richard Gage, AIA

CCTV,
with Richard Gage, AIA

FOX News
with Richard Gage, AIA

Vancouver Omni TV,
with Richard Gage, AIA

Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

Visit our store

Schutz der Öffentlichkeit vor Informationen

Leserbriefe

Freitag, den 06. August 2010 um 18:40 Uhr

Schutz der Öffentlichkeit vor Informationen

Veröffentlicht am 3. August 2010 in der North County Times

Es gibt eine amerikanische Bundeseinrichtung, die das Gesetz zur Informationsfreiheit missachtet: Dr. Patrick Gallagher, Leiter des National Institute for Standards and Technology in Amerika (NIST), verweigerte die Anfrage des Statikers Ronald Brookman, der Informationen über eine statische Berechnung einsehen wollte. NIST hatte diese Daten bei der Bestimmung des Einsturzgrundes für Gebäude 7 gesammelt. Die Begründung von Gallagher für die Verweigerung war, dass die Freigabe dieser Informationen die „öffentliche Sicherheit aufs Spiel setzen könnte“.

Was die öffentliche Sicherheit wirklich aufs Spiel setzen könnte, ist Experten aus der Bauindustrie, wie Herr Brookman, die NIST-Analyse „nicht“ für unabhängige Untersuchungen des sehr ungewöhnlichen Gebäudeeinsturzes zugänglich zu machen.

Präsident Obama befürwortete am ersten Tag seiner neuen Administration Transparenz und Offenheit der Regierung. Gallagher machte die obige Aussage am 9. July 2009, mehr als fünf Monate später – das komplette Gegenteil von Offenheit der Regierung. Was macht die Öffentlichkeit daraus?

Und wo ist unser Kongress? Keiner der Abgeordneten im Kongress hat bisher auch nur ein einziges Wort des Bedenkens geäußert. Hat der Kongress keine Kontrollfunktion mehr? Sind Sie damit einverstanden, dass die Behörden Sie für dumm verkaufen?

Dwain Deets
Encinitas, California

übersetzt aus dem Englischen von René Seidel, Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! JavaScript muss aktiviert werden, damit sie angezeigt werden kann. , www.lingoprime.eu

< Zurück

Download High-Quality Video Clips

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

Rapid onset of collapse
Sounds of explosions
Symmetrical structural failure
Free-fall acceleration through the path of what was greatest resistance
Imploded, collapsing completely, landing almost in its own footprint
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional
Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:

FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
Extremely rapid onset of destruction
Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
1200-foot-diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front
Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

The three high-rises exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed