Log in      Flickr      Youtube      Facebook      Twitter
    left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version

    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"

    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Visit our Store
    Visit our store

    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    Leserbriefe
    Victims families and scientists call for new investigation of 9/11 Drucken E-Mail
    Leserbriefe
    Samstag, den 12. März 2011 um 00:49 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Victims families and scientists call for new, genuine investigation of 9/11

    Peace Arch News, http://www.bclocalnews.com, 9/8/2010

    My name is Kip Warner and I am a 27-year old White Rock [British Columbia, Canada] based, software engineer, and entrepreneur. I write in regards to a matter of dire import, in honour of those who died on September 11th, 2001, and in support of their families who are still seeking the truth about that day; including Bob McIlvaine, who lost his 26-year old son, Bobby.

    On March 1, 2010, Mr. McIlvaine delivered a petition to each of the 50 members of the New York City Council on behalf of 1,000 architects and engineers. The petition called upon the City Council to open an investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane, which nevertheless fell into its own footprint at 5:20 in the afternoon of September 11th. The federal government said that fire brought down Building 7, however, [more than] 1,277 architects and engineers provide us with overwhelming evidence that Building 7 was brought down with explosives, and that the government deliberately lied to us.

    Scientists from the University of Copenhagen, UC Berkeley, and others noted in their groundbreaking paper, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”, the presence of “red/gray chips” in all samples of the dust collected in the aftermath of the collapse, collected from multiple locations, by different individuals, both before and after first responders arrived on scene. They end their 25 page, peer-reviewed, chemical analysis published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, with the following: “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips...is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material,” (p.23).

    The government of the United State's report on Building 7 included collapse models that in no way resemble the actual collapse. Even today, the government refuses to provide the public with detailed information on these models, saying releasing the information “may jeopardize public safety.” The government’s models show deformations, walls folding inwards and an asymmetrical collapse, instead of the smooth, symmetrical free fall drop that Building 7 actually underwent. Google “Building 7” to see footage.

    Our organization's lawyers forced NIST to release the model, but NIST withheld 75% of the files under a technicality a new law which says they can withhold anything to do with 9/11 if they deem it necessary.

    My father, a professional mechanical engineer of 33 years experience and a successful business owner who provided the fabric structures at ground zero, confirmed this after a doctoral engineer working for his company examined the official NIST data that was released. He believes that the model, analysis, and conclusions of the 911 Commission Report and the technical data upon which it is based are deeply flawed. It appears as though NIST attempted to adjust the model and beam connection details in order to get the model to collapse the way WTC7 actually collapsed.

    This was the first time in history that any concrete and steel sky scraper structure had collapsed due to fire, let alone three of them - all on the same day.

    A report on a 2001 conference suggests who was working on nano-thermite at this time - not to be confused with regular thermite. “All of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nano-materials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives...nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons, particularly due to their high degree of tailorability with regards to energy release and impulse management,” (Miziolek AW. Nanoenergetics: an emerging technology area of national importance. Amptiac Q 2002; 6(1): 43-48).

    Noam Chomsky once noted a powerful means of presenting the people with the illusion of freedom is to set very narrow parameters for acceptable opinion, then allow for lively debate within that spectrum. Given this powerful new damning evidence, we now know that this was neither “blowback” (“far left”), nor an expression of an irate theology thought to be defective by design (“far right”). Everything from issues surrounding airport security, extremism, Guantanamo Bay, all the way to the justification of the deployment of Canadian troops in Afghanistan on the grounds that 24 Canadians were killed on 9/11; and our very own National Research Council who set our building codes, must now be re-evaluated rationally as this elaborate house of cards comes down - given the scope of these evidentially based ramifications. We must now be prepared to seriously question the official conspiracy theory's premise that men in caves conspired to take down NORAD, attack the most well defended fortification in the world, and pulverize thousands of tonnes of the World Trade Center complex's concrete and steel to talcum powder. We've been living a lie.

    As we mark the 9th anniversary of 9/11, it is time to get the truth about what happened, starting with Building 7. To quote Bob McIlvaine: “Please join our coordinated effort to bring justice to my son and the thousands that were murdered on September 11th.” Go to BuildingWhat.org to learn more.

    In closing, all that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.


    Kip Warner
    Software Engineer
     
    Question about Changing Meaning of 9/11 Memorial Drucken E-Mail
    Leserbriefe
    Samstag, den 12. März 2011 um 00:42 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Question about Changing Meaning of 9/11 Memorial

    Daily Collegian (University of Massachusetts), 10/6/2010

    http://dailycollegian.com/2010/10/06/43123/

    Dear Editor,

    Last week, I attended a talk by Michael Arad, the designer of the World Trade Center’s September 11 Memorial called “Reflecting Absence.” This talk was sponsored by the Architecture and Design program at the University of Massachusetts and it touched on many aspects of the design evolution from conceptualization through the nuts and bolts of construction and on to which trees would provide the best canopy for pedestrians.

    He related his belief in the power and appropriateness of his design during the competition even though the odds against it selection had been daunting. He related the frustrations and triumphs in working with other stakeholders to achieve a design that would be meaningful, enduring and most important, meet the building codes and public safety requirements.

    He talked about concepts he had learned from his professors and how he had synthesized them. He emphasized that everything needed to be addressed in the design stage, because once it is finalized, you can’t be told, for example, that it needs a railing, because that would change the perspective of the entire memorial.

    After the formal talk, he asked for questions and I took the opportunity to pose one that intrigues me. I began my question stating that “the meaning of memorials change as the understanding of the event evolves over time. The event that this memorial recalls is the death of thousands of people after planes hit the building, creating fires that led to their complete and catastrophic collapse down into their basements.” I identified myself as a registered professional engineer and one of over 1300 architects and engineers that believe that the evidence is overwhelming that the three skyscrapers were, in fact, destroyed by controlled demolition using pre-planted explosives. I continued, “How will the meaning of this memorial change as those irrefutable facts become more well-known?” Arad declined to answer that question stating his disagreement with my premise.

    While disappointed with his response, I sat half-listening to other questions while I silently recounted my own evolving experiences with another memorial – the Vietnam Memorial. My first visit was in 1985 shortly after its completion. At that time it was a place to remember individuals; to touch the small voids in the wall that spelled their names; to reflect on the void that their sacrifices left in their world. It was a place to remember individual losses and sacrifices. Over the years as I learned more about the Vietnam War including the deceit behind the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the meaning of the memorial shifted to the immensity of the tragedy. In recent years as I have advocated for veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and learned that if the wall were to be expanded to include veterans that committed suicide upon their return, it would need to be two to six times larger. So now, to me, the meaning of that memorial has become a symbol that calls out for peace, truth and justice so that such a senseless war never occurs again.

    As I reflect on the design that Michael Arad has brought forth, I believe that because of its focus on loss and remembrance it will be an enduring design whose meaning can grow and adapt as our understanding of the events of that day in 2001 evolve. I look forward to experiencing it once it is open to the public.

    Wayne H. Coste, P.E.
    Tariffville, CT
    Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
     
    Gab es am 11. September einen dritten Lichtstrahl? Drucken E-Mail
    Leserbriefe
    Donnerstag, den 21. Oktober 2010 um 16:52 Uhr

    Gab es am 11. September 2010 einen dritten Lichtstrahl?

    Urspüngliche URL: http://www.nctimes.com/news/opinion/letters/article_0e2db71b-23e4-5442-b319-44827428dc93.html

    Hunderttausende New Yorker dachten, dass sie am 11. September 2010 einen dritten Lichtstrahl sahen, der von Ground Zero ausging. In den vergangenen Jahren haben immer zwei Lichtstrahle am Jahrestag von 9/11 in den Himmel gezeigt, um denen zu gedenken, die ihr Leben in den Twin Towers verloren. Aber dieses Jahr staunten Tausende über einen dritten Strahl. Viele riefen bei ihren lokalen Medien an, um sich zu erkundigen. Im Allgemeinen erfuhren sie, dass dieser Lichtstrahl Gebäude 7 symbolisiert, das dritte Gebäude das einstürzte.

    Über PRNewswire bracht "Architects & Engineers for 9 / 11 Truth" am 11. September 2010 eine Pressemitteilung für die Metropolitan Area New York City heraus. Diese Mitteilung erklärte, dass der dritte Strahl die Tatsache beleuchten soll, dass "die offizielle Geschichte über was am Ground Zero passiert ist, einfach nicht wahr sein kann und dass eine neue, wirklich unabhängige Untersuchung erforderlich ist. Diese neue Untersuchung wird gebraucht, einerseits für die nationale Sicherheit und andererseits als Schlüssel für wirkliche Gerechtigkeit für die Opfer der Anschläge auf die Twin Towers". (http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/1280-architects-and-engineers-launch-third-light-beam-into-nyc-night-skyline-on-9th-anniversary-of-september-11th-102706039.html).

    PRNewswire berichtete später, dass diese Pressemitteilung die zweithöchste Zahl von Abrufen auf ihrer Webseite an diesem Tag erhielt. Aber die Hauptmedien verloren am nächsten Tag kein Wort darüber. Wenn die Medien über etwas nicht berichten, ist es dann nicht passiert?

    Dwain Deets

    Encinitas, CA
     
    Experte könnte einer 9/11 Untersuchung helfen Drucken E-Mail
    Leserbriefe
    Dienstag, den 07. September 2010 um 19:10 Uhr

    Experte könnte einer 9/11 Untersuchung helfen

    Hrsg.: Veröffentlicht in “The Daily Progress” für Charlottesville, Virginia, am 7. September 2010. Verfügbar unter: http://www2.dailyprogress.com/news/2010/sep/04/expert-could-help-911-study-ar-488256/

    Danke an “The Daily Progress” für Bryan McKenzie’s ausgezeichneten Artikel über die Vorlesung, gehalten von Dr. Philip Zelikow an der University of Virginia im Miller Center am 31. August („Professor bestärkt örtliche Nationsbildung“). Ich habe Dr. Zelikows Vorlesung besucht und war von der Fähigkeit begeistert, wie er seine Erfahrung auf das schwierige Thema Nationsbildung anwenden kann.

    Wie im Artikel und auch während der Vorlesung hervorgehoben, ist Dr. Zelikow der ehemalige verantwortliche Direktor der 9/11 Comission. Er wird an der University of Virginia für diese Arbeit oft gelobt.

    Jetzt wurden aber neue Informationen über 9/11 aufgedeckt. Zum Beispiel präsentieren mehr als 1.200 professionelle Architekten und Ingieneure Beweise dafür, dass die Twin Towers und Gebäude 7 durch eine kontrollierte Sprengung eingestürzt sind (AE911truth.org). Ein Beispiel, das sie als Beweis nennen, ist die Entdeckung eines Teams aus amerikanischen und internationalen Wissenschaftlern: der Sprengstoff Nano-Thermit war in den Gebäuden vorhanden, bevor sie einstürzten. Rückstände von detoniertem Nano-Thermit wurden im Staub der zusammengestürzten Türme gefunden.

    Laut Umfragen wollen fast die Hälfte der Amerikaner eine neue Untersuchung von 9/11. Auch wenn Dr. Zelikows als Vorsitzender der 9/11 Comission ausgezeichnete Arbeit geleistet hat, kennen wir jetzt neue Details über den 11. September. Seine Arbeit muss mit diesen neuen Beweisen vervollständigt werden. Dr. Zelikow hier an der University of Virginia zu haben, ist eine gute Gelegenheit für die 9/11 Wahrheitsbewegung die alten und neuen Beweise zu 9/11 offen zu diskutieren. Wie Thomas Jefferson sagte: „ Wir haben keine Angst der Wahrheit zu folgen, wohin sie auch führen möge, noch einen Fehler zu tolerieren, solange die Vernunft sie ungehindert bekämpfen kann.“

    Dr. Thomas P. Hansen
    Albemarle County

    Thanks to The Daily Progress for Bryan McKenzie’s excellent article about the lecture Dr. Philip Zelikow gave at the University of Virginia Miller Center on Aug 31 (“Professor encourages local nation-building). I attended Dr. Zelikow’s lecture, and I was impressed with his ability to apply his expertise to the difficult topic of nation-building.

    As noted in the article and at the lecture, Dr. Zelikow is the former executive director of the 9/11 Commission. He is often commended at UVa for that work.

    But now, new information about 9/11 has been uncovered. For example, more than 1,200 professional architects and engineers are presenting new evidence indicating that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition (AE911truth.org). One piece of evidence they cite is the discovery by a team of U.S. and international scientists that the explosive nano-thermite was present in the buildings before they collapsed. Residue of exploded nano-thermite was found in the dust from the collapse of the Towers.

    In polls, nearly half of Americans want a new investigation of 9/11. While Dr. Zelikow may have done an excellent job as the director of the 9/11 Commission, now we know new details about 9/11. His work needs to be informed by this new evidence. Having Dr. Zelikow right here at UVa is an opportunity for our community to openly discuss the old and new evidence regarding 9/11. As Thomas Jefferson said, “We are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.”
     
    Wieviele Wolkenkratzer sind an 9/11 eingestürzt? Drucken E-Mail
    Leserbriefe
    Freitag, den 06. August 2010 um 19:20 Uhr

    Wieviele Wolkenkratzer sind an 9/11 eingestürzt?

    North County Times, 10. Mai 2010

    Fast jeder, der nicht zur 9/11 Wahrheitsbewegung gehört und dem Ich die Frage stelle: “Wieviele Türme sind am 11. September eingestürzt?“, denkt, dass es nur zwei Türme waren, dabei waren es in Wirklichkeit drei. Gebäude 7, ein 47-stöckiges Bauwerk wurde zwar nicht von einem Flugzeug getroffen, ist aber dennoch ein Drittel seines 7-sekündigen, symmetrischen Einsturzes in Freifallgeschwindigkeit gefallen.

    Wann wird es endlich eine richtige Untersuchung geben, um herauszufinden was an 9/11 passiert ist? Was zu endlosen Kriegen, Qualen und der Verwendung von abgereichertem Uran, Phosphor, Splitterbomben und Bunker brechenden Waffen geführt hat, die wahllos Menschen töten? 9/11 Truth macht den Kriegen ein Ende.

    Steve Fahrney
    San Diego
     
    Weitere Beiträge...
    << Start < Zurück 1 2 3 Weiter > Ende >>

    Seite 2 von 3