Écrit par Darcy Wearing and Richard Gage, AIA
|
Jeudi, 24 Juin 2010 18:55 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Having had the privilege of speaking with Tom Sullivan, an actual explosive-charge placement technician, we have some new insights to pass along as to how controlled demolition works, where it started, and the effect that 9/11 had on the demolition industry. Sullivan gained his experience as an employee of the leading firm in this field, Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI). Sullivan stresses though “I do not in anyway represent CDI and what I have to say is based on my own experience and training,”
Sullivan attended high school with Doug Loizeaux of the Loizeaux family. The Loizeaux family, through the father Jack, independently started the whole controlled-demolition industry and turned it into a highly profitable business. Sullivan, before he became connected to CDI, was an independent photographer during his early years in Maryland. He would be sent to CD sites and take still pictures of the jobs. He became infatuated with the CD industry. The time came when he would do both, being the placer of the “cutter charges” on the primary joints, and photographing the jobs for promoting the business. Soon he would switch to full-time employee status of CDI -- as verified by AE911Truth’s verification team.
"It was very interesting, but also very hard work, long hours, especially in the cold weather," Sullivan reflects. He stated that the days began early, around 6 a.m., and they would work until the sun was down. Sullivan had the experience of preparing a building by placing the cutter charges throughout the primary joints, and then, of course, watching it all come down.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Mark Graham, Volunteer Coordinator
|
Mercredi, 23 Juin 2010 17:10 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
On the home page of our website, AE911Truth.org, you may have noticed the tab near the top center that says, “Help out.” If you open that page you will find descriptions of the teams at AE911Truth, and the current projects of these teams.
You can be in any state or any country, and still volunteer with AE911Truth. Each of our teams keeps in touch via a weekly conference call, plus phone, email, and a web environment called Basecamp. If you want to help us complete our mission -- obtaining a real investigation of the destruction of the 3 WTC high-rises, contact us -- as we need more volunteers.
We have teams working on congressional outreach, fundraising, graphics, marketing, the Online Store, presentations, public outreach, translations, video, writing and more. There are even some opportunities to be a team leader. Let me introduce you to three very real volunteers who are contributing daily to our success. Here are Darcy Wearing, Marsha Elliott, and Sean Brizendine:
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Terry Hansen
|
Mardi, 22 Juin 2010 22:30 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Ed: As AE911Truth makes many efforts to promote its mission among and through the mainstream media, this article offers some reasons why that has proven to be a daunting and largely unsuccessful effort.
For many Americans, one of the strongest reasons for accepting the official story about the shocking events of Sept. 11, 2001, is their deep-seated belief in the free press. We are taught from an early age that the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution guarantees us many cherished freedoms, among which is freedom of the press.
If there were really any serious problems with the official 9-11 explanation, many Americans reason, this information wouldn't go unreported for long in our media-saturated society. Major news organizations such as CNN, Time, and the New York Times would most certainly investigate and report any serious problems almost immediately. Nearly all major American news organizations have embraced the government's version of events with few questions asked. Consequently, many Americans naturally conclude that it's safe to accept the official story at face value.
There is a very serious flaw in this line of reasoning, however: The United States is at war and, for nearly a hundred years, the U.S. government, major media companies and leading journalists have joined forces with the military during wars and other national emergencies to shape public opinion by carefully controlling what Americans are told about world events.
Especially since World War I, whenever the U.S. government has chosen to take the nation to war, or to address some other major emergency, it has quietly called upon top journalists and media executives to help overcome anti-war sentiment, promote popular hostility toward a designated enemy, or simply calm public anxieties. This may seem surprising to many readers, so it is worth reviewing a few historical examples of such media-government collusion.
Because deception is a fundamental technique of warfare, military organizations have sought control over war-related information virtually since the dawn of human history.
The Chinese writer Sun Tzu put it well in his classic work, The Art of War: “All war is based on deception,” he wrote. “Therefore, when capable, feign incapacity; when active, inactivity. When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are near. Offer the enemy a bait to lure him; feign disorder and strike him.” 1
In modern times, deception has always employed two fundamental stages: censorship followed by propaganda. Censorship deprives the public and enemies of accurate information about what is taking place. Once this information vacuum has been created, propaganda is injected into this conceptual void, thus creating a false but entirely believable picture of events. In the age of mass media, this simply couldn't be achieved without the assistance of major news organizations, journalists, and other communication outlets. Thus, governments nearly always appeal to these organizations for help in this complex task.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par David Ray Griffin
|
Mardi, 22 Juin 2010 20:10 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Note: Published originally on May 27, 2010 at 911Truth.org. SCAD – “State Crimes Against Democracy”, February 2010 issue of American Behavioral Scientist
At 5:21 PM on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been hit by a plane – a fact that is important because of the widespread acceptance of the idea, in spite of its scientific absurdity, that the Twin Towers collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airliners plus the ensuing jet-fuel-fed fires. The collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) thereby challenges the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, according to which it was accomplished by al-Qaeda hijackers, even if one accepts the government’s scientifically impossible account of the Twin Towers. This fact was recently emphasized in the title of a review article based on my 2009 book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7,1 by National Medal of Science-winner Lynn Margulis: “Two Hit, Three Down – The Biggest Lie.”2
1. Why the Collapse of WTC 7 Created an Extraordinary Problem
The collapse of WTC 7 created an extraordinary problem for the official account of 9/11 for several reasons.
An Unprecedented Occurrence
One reason is that, because of the collapse of WTC 7, the official account of 9/11 includes the dubious claim that, for the first time in the known universe, a steel-frame high-rise building was brought down by fire, and science looks askance at claims of unprecedented occurrences regarding physical phenomena. New York Times writer James Glanz, who himself has a Ph.D. in physics, wrote: “[E]xperts said no building like it, a modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire.” Glanz then quoted a structural engineer as saying: “[W]ithin the structural engineering community, [WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question, “why did 7 come down?”3
Visual Evidence of Implosion
Equally remarkable, besides the mere fact that this building came down, was the way it collapsed: straight down, in virtual free fall, making the destruction of this building appear to be an example of the type of controlled demolition known as “implosion,” in which explosives and/or incendiaries are used to slice the building’s steel support columns in such a way as to cause the building to collapse into its own footprint. CBS anchor Dan Rather, not one to let a remarkable fact go unremarked, said:
“[I]t’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen . . . on television . . . , where a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down.”4
|
Lire la suite...
|
|
Écrit par Editor
|
Mardi, 22 Juin 2010 19:39 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Grassroots efforts in the form of inexpensive display booths are starting to make appearances in community fairs and festivals all over the country. AE911Truth volunteer Scott Beery led off with a bit more ambitious version of an AE911Truth booth, including TV monitors to display the Towers exploding, and Building 7 in freefall. See the article on this booth at the SF Power to the Peaceful Festival, just one of the many public events at which Beery brought the irrefutable 9/11 Truth evidence to the people through the unique features of his custom designed booth, and of course, the dedicated AE911Truth activists who staffed the booth. Recently, many individual AE911Truth activists have taken it upon themselves to make the necessary arrangements with festival and fair authorities, and then bring banners and materials to set up their booths on the day of their respective events. In a grassroots fashion, two of these booths were organized, one by John Tobak, in Woodbridge, New Jersey, and the other by Scott Thompson, in Bellingham, Washington. Both had successful 9/11 awareness-raising projects with lots of visitors on the respective days of the fairs. A Street Fair in Woodbridge, New Jersey
On Saturday, May 15, John Tobak, and his friend Charbel Zogheib staffed a booth at a street fair in Woodbridge, NJ. Their 10’ x 10’ booth included an 8’ x 3’ banner: “Hundreds of Architects & Engineers Demand a Real 9/11 Investigation.” The current banner reads “1,000”! Between 10:30 am and 5 pm, Zogheib handed out 400 of the “What the Government & Media Are Not Telling You About 9/11” brochures, and Tobak handed out 400 of the “Explosive Evidence” cards. Based on the fact that some people took both Zogheib’s brochure and Tobak’s card, they estimated that they gave AE911Truth literature to approximately 700 people.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Barbara Honegger
|
Lundi, 21 Juin 2010 19:31 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
AE911Truth Spoken of by Several Presenters – Courted by Alternative Media
The spectacular explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil-drilling platform was a darkly resonant backdrop for the paradigm-challenging “Understanding Deep Politics” conference held in Santa Cruz, CA, May 14-16.
Just as everyone knows that the “real story” isn’t the fireball or even the massive slick on the surface, but the invisible deep source of the catastrophe, a critical mass of world Truth leaders came together to expose the deep and dark forces behind the staged explosions of 9/11, the ongoing geopolitical catastrophe they were used to justify, and the slick of official myths spread by the mainstream media to try to keep the American public from waking up and ending its collective nightmare. The “Deep Politics” theme of the conference originated with one of the keynote speakers, University of California Berkeley Emeritus Professor Peter Dale Scott. Prof. Scott coined the term “deep politics” to refer to the covert “dark side” goals, means and operations of a hard-right “Western” military, intelligence, corporate and criminal cabal behind the series of engineered crises that have shaken America and the world -- the facilitated “Reichstag Fire” attack on U.S. ships at Pearl Harbor that had the desired effect of catapulting America into World War II; the myth of the U.S. ship attack in the Gulf of Tonkin used to escalate the Vietnam War; the assassination of JFK, who refused to attack Cuba, and of RFK and MLK, who wanted to end the Vietnam War; the attack on the USS Cole, which was intended to escalate the U.S. military presence in the Middle East, but didn’t; the 9/11 “Reichstag Fire” self-attack on their own world military headquarters, the Pentagon, and the World Trade Center used to burst the cabal’s geopolitical agenda to the surface; and the WMD Big Lie used to rationalize the attack on Iraq.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Rich Caragol, Architect
|
Vendredi, 11 Juin 2010 20:19 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
As a busy summer approaches, AE911Truth Founder and CEO, Richard Gage, AIA, will be traveling around the globe disseminating key scientific forensic evidence regarding the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers. With this effort, AE911Truth is moving the fulcrum and tipping the scales toward a new and independent investigation.
On June 26, Mr. Gage makes a return engagement to Tucson, Arizona to present 9/11: Blueprint For Truth - The Architecture of Destruction to 911 Truth Tucson at St Mark's Presbyterian Church. 911 Truth Tucson has been active since 2006 and has hosted many esteemed speakers including Richard Gage, AIA, Dr. David Ray Griffin, Dr. Stephen Jones, William Rodriguez, and Jim Spetzer. Karen Woerner, founding member 911Truth Tucson and event coordinator, said of the event:
We have had great success through presentations by many formidable and knowledgeable speakers. These events have boosted membership, brought new individuals to awareness, changed perceptions, and in-creased skepticism about the official story. The nucleus shifts the 911Truth Movement with each new active member.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par AE911Truth Staff
|
Samedi, 22 Mai 2010 05:00 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Family Members & 2,100 Architects & Engineers: "Missing WTC Exhibits: Third Tower – Building 7"
Press Conference – Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
- Saturday, May 24, 2014 – 1:00 PM
- Memorial Grounds Entrance – corner of Greenwich St. and Liberty St.
Live multimedia presentation – Richard Gage, AIA
|
Lire la suite...
|
Mardi, 18 Mai 2010 18:56 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
Canada came, saw, and in the end agreed — 9/11 needs to be re–investigated. It began in Ottawa on April 30 at Carleton University. The critics remained silent until shortly before the show at which Richard Gage, AIA, was scheduled to present 9/11: Blueprint for Truth. But, one hour before the event, CBC News released their shot across the bow, changing what would have been a “below-the-radar” event into one with considerably more attention.
The crowd was eager with anticipation, particularly with this blast from CBC, although some were uncertain about what really caused the World Trade Center building destructions prior to the event. A show of hands indicated that out of 196 attendees, 41 were unsure how the towers came down, and only one person believed that it was linked to Al-Qaeda. The remaining believed that controlled demolition brought the Twin Towers down.
Mr. Gage received a standing ovation as he was introduced by ground-zero-eye-witness David Long, from Truth Action Ottawa, the organizers of the event. I thought his presentation was considerably more dynamic and updated than what I had seen on the DVD. I can relate the experience of watching the live presentation of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth to listening to one’s favorite musician, and then going to see that person in concert. They usually end up blowing you away. What I actually think has happened is that Mr. Gage has honed his presentation to near perfection, after nearly 100 live presentations since the making of the DVD. The final showing of hands following his presentation showed that, out of 41 who were originally unsure, only four remained unsure. And the one original person believing in the official account of events no longer believed that way.
|
Lire la suite...
|
Écrit par Basil Andrews - with Howard Jones
|
Vendredi, 14 Mai 2010 20:08 |
Nous sommes désolés, il n'existe pas de traduction de ce texte pour le moment.
The last time I visited a University campus was 20 years ago when I went to see John Judge who had a 1st generation Zapruder film and discussed why the Lone Gunman Story just wasn’t true. I felt powerless, passive and out of touch with my fellow man in creating momentum to hold someone accountable. There were many people who believed the government’s story — which brought about speculation and no concrete proof. No fingerprint, no physical evidence, eye witnesses, no facts. So it seemed! This is why AE911Truth and all others who endeavor to expose 9/11 and bring justice brought forth these thoughts as I watched the recent double header of “Firefighters, Architects & Engineers Expose 9/11 Myths” via live stream video…
…the bagpipes start…. Michele Weiss-Little, sister of David Weiss of Rescue One, Midtown Manhattan is paying a touching tribute to her brother and the other fallen heroes: “MURDERED” we are reminded vividly, along with over 3,000 other humans that day. She said:
With the power of love, with the power of our hearts, we can push back the evil men do, face the truth, find the courage to open our hearts, to hold accountable, to be responsible, to forgive, to love.
The haunting strains of the lone piper playing Amazing Grace and projected photographs of the 343 firefighters who died at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, struck a somber note before a sellout crowd at the Marin Showcase Theater last Friday where main speakers Erik Lawyer, founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth and Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, exposed the myths of the official story of 9/11.
In Scotland the sound of the bagpipes is a sure sign that something is happening. From weddings to battles the bagpipes are there throughout history — to celebrate or commemorate. I watched the faces of the fallen firefighters at the start of the conference, as the bagpipes played in tribute to them, realizing that heroes are rare; William Wallace is remembered for a famous victory at Stirling Bridge on Sep 11, 1297. 704 years later, the firefighters at the World Trade Center went into battle, with similar courage. Brave hearts are what heroes are made of.
|
Lire la suite...
|
|
|
|
<< Début < Précédent 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Suivant > Fin >>
|
Page 46 sur 64 |