left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    Letters To The Editor
    Victims families and scientists call for new investigation of 9/11 Print E-mail
    Letters To The Editor
    Saturday, 12 March 2011 00:49

    Victims families and scientists call for new, genuine investigation of 9/11

    Peace Arch News, http://www.bclocalnews.com, 9/8/2010

    My name is Kip Warner and I am a 27-year old White Rock [British Columbia, Canada] based, software engineer, and entrepreneur. I write in regards to a matter of dire import, in honour of those who died on September 11th, 2001, and in support of their families who are still seeking the truth about that day; including Bob McIlvaine, who lost his 26-year old son, Bobby.

    On March 1, 2010, Mr. McIlvaine delivered a petition to each of the 50 members of the New York City Council on behalf of 1,000 architects and engineers. The petition called upon the City Council to open an investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane, which nevertheless fell into its own footprint at 5:20 in the afternoon of September 11th. The federal government said that fire brought down Building 7, however, [more than] 1,277 architects and engineers provide us with overwhelming evidence that Building 7 was brought down with explosives, and that the government deliberately lied to us.

    Scientists from the University of Copenhagen, UC Berkeley, and others noted in their groundbreaking paper, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”, the presence of “red/gray chips” in all samples of the dust collected in the aftermath of the collapse, collected from multiple locations, by different individuals, both before and after first responders arrived on scene. They end their 25 page, peer-reviewed, chemical analysis published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, with the following: “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips...is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material,” (p.23).

    The government of the United State's report on Building 7 included collapse models that in no way resemble the actual collapse. Even today, the government refuses to provide the public with detailed information on these models, saying releasing the information “may jeopardize public safety.” The government’s models show deformations, walls folding inwards and an asymmetrical collapse, instead of the smooth, symmetrical free fall drop that Building 7 actually underwent. Google “Building 7” to see footage.

    Our organization's lawyers forced NIST to release the model, but NIST withheld 75% of the files under a technicality a new law which says they can withhold anything to do with 9/11 if they deem it necessary.

    My father, a professional mechanical engineer of 33 years experience and a successful business owner who provided the fabric structures at ground zero, confirmed this after a doctoral engineer working for his company examined the official NIST data that was released. He believes that the model, analysis, and conclusions of the 911 Commission Report and the technical data upon which it is based are deeply flawed. It appears as though NIST attempted to adjust the model and beam connection details in order to get the model to collapse the way WTC7 actually collapsed.

    This was the first time in history that any concrete and steel sky scraper structure had collapsed due to fire, let alone three of them - all on the same day.

    A report on a 2001 conference suggests who was working on nano-thermite at this time - not to be confused with regular thermite. “All of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nano-materials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives...nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons, particularly due to their high degree of tailorability with regards to energy release and impulse management,” (Miziolek AW. Nanoenergetics: an emerging technology area of national importance. Amptiac Q 2002; 6(1): 43-48).

    Noam Chomsky once noted a powerful means of presenting the people with the illusion of freedom is to set very narrow parameters for acceptable opinion, then allow for lively debate within that spectrum. Given this powerful new damning evidence, we now know that this was neither “blowback” (“far left”), nor an expression of an irate theology thought to be defective by design (“far right”). Everything from issues surrounding airport security, extremism, Guantanamo Bay, all the way to the justification of the deployment of Canadian troops in Afghanistan on the grounds that 24 Canadians were killed on 9/11; and our very own National Research Council who set our building codes, must now be re-evaluated rationally as this elaborate house of cards comes down - given the scope of these evidentially based ramifications. We must now be prepared to seriously question the official conspiracy theory's premise that men in caves conspired to take down NORAD, attack the most well defended fortification in the world, and pulverize thousands of tonnes of the World Trade Center complex's concrete and steel to talcum powder. We've been living a lie.

    As we mark the 9th anniversary of 9/11, it is time to get the truth about what happened, starting with Building 7. To quote Bob McIlvaine: “Please join our coordinated effort to bring justice to my son and the thousands that were murdered on September 11th.” Go to BuildingWhat.org to learn more.

    In closing, all that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.


    Kip Warner
    Software Engineer


     
    Question about Changing Meaning of 9/11 Memorial Print E-mail
    Letters To The Editor
    Saturday, 12 March 2011 00:42

    Question about Changing Meaning of 9/11 Memorial

    Daily Collegian (University of Massachusetts), 10/6/2010

    http://dailycollegian.com/2010/10/06/43123/

    Dear Editor,

    Last week, I attended a talk by Michael Arad, the designer of the World Trade Center’s September 11 Memorial called “Reflecting Absence.” This talk was sponsored by the Architecture and Design program at the University of Massachusetts and it touched on many aspects of the design evolution from conceptualization through the nuts and bolts of construction and on to which trees would provide the best canopy for pedestrians.

    He related his belief in the power and appropriateness of his design during the competition even though the odds against it selection had been daunting. He related the frustrations and triumphs in working with other stakeholders to achieve a design that would be meaningful, enduring and most important, meet the building codes and public safety requirements.

    He talked about concepts he had learned from his professors and how he had synthesized them. He emphasized that everything needed to be addressed in the design stage, because once it is finalized, you can’t be told, for example, that it needs a railing, because that would change the perspective of the entire memorial.

    After the formal talk, he asked for questions and I took the opportunity to pose one that intrigues me. I began my question stating that “the meaning of memorials change as the understanding of the event evolves over time. The event that this memorial recalls is the death of thousands of people after planes hit the building, creating fires that led to their complete and catastrophic collapse down into their basements.” I identified myself as a registered professional engineer and one of over 1300 architects and engineers that believe that the evidence is overwhelming that the three skyscrapers were, in fact, destroyed by controlled demolition using pre-planted explosives. I continued, “How will the meaning of this memorial change as those irrefutable facts become more well-known?” Arad declined to answer that question stating his disagreement with my premise.

    While disappointed with his response, I sat half-listening to other questions while I silently recounted my own evolving experiences with another memorial – the Vietnam Memorial. My first visit was in 1985 shortly after its completion. At that time it was a place to remember individuals; to touch the small voids in the wall that spelled their names; to reflect on the void that their sacrifices left in their world. It was a place to remember individual losses and sacrifices. Over the years as I learned more about the Vietnam War including the deceit behind the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the meaning of the memorial shifted to the immensity of the tragedy. In recent years as I have advocated for veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and learned that if the wall were to be expanded to include veterans that committed suicide upon their return, it would need to be two to six times larger. So now, to me, the meaning of that memorial has become a symbol that calls out for peace, truth and justice so that such a senseless war never occurs again.

    As I reflect on the design that Michael Arad has brought forth, I believe that because of its focus on loss and remembrance it will be an enduring design whose meaning can grow and adapt as our understanding of the events of that day in 2001 evolve. I look forward to experiencing it once it is open to the public.

    Wayne H. Coste, P.E.
    Tariffville, CT
    Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

     
    Was there a third light beam on Sept. 11, 2010? Print E-mail
    Letters To The Editor
    Thursday, 21 October 2010 16:52

    Original URL: http://www.nctimes.com/news/opinion/letters/article_0e2db71b-23e4-5442-b319-44827428dc93.html

    Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers thought they saw a third light beam emanating from Ground Zero on Sept. 11, 2010. Two light beams have shown skyward on the 9/11 anniversary for several previous years, memorializing the lives lost in the Twin Towers. But this year, thousands were astounded to see a third beam. Many called their local media, asking about it. They generally were told it stood for the third building that collapsed, Building 7.

    A news release was issued to the New York City metro area by "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" through PRNewswire on Sept. 11, 2010. The explanation stated the third beam was to shine light "on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a new, truly independent investigation is needed. This new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to real justice for the victims of the Twin Towers" (http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/1280-architects-and-engineers-launch-third-light-beam-into-nyc-night-skyline-on-9th-anniversary-of-september-11th-102706039.html).

    PRNewswire reported later this news release received the second highest number of viewers on their website that day. Yet mainstream media said not a word about this the next day. If the media didn't report it, does that mean it didn't happen?

    Dwain Deets

    Encinitas

     
    Expert could help a 9/11 study Print E-mail
    Letters To The Editor
    Tuesday, 07 September 2010 19:10

    Expert could help a 9/11 study

    Ed: Published in "The Daily Progress" of Charlotttesville, Virginia, Sep. 7, 2010. Available at http://www2.dailyprogress.com/news/2010/sep/04/expert-could-help-911-study-ar-488256/

    Thanks to The Daily Progress for Bryan McKenzie’s excellent article about the lecture Dr. Philip Zelikow gave at the University of Virginia Miller Center on Aug 31 (“Professor encourages local nation-building). I attended Dr. Zelikow’s lecture, and I was impressed with his ability to apply his expertise to the difficult topic of nation-building.

    As noted in the article and at the lecture, Dr. Zelikow is the former executive director of the 9/11 Commission. He is often commended at UVa for that work.

    But now, new information about 9/11 has been uncovered. For example, more than 1,200 professional architects and engineers are presenting new evidence indicating that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition (AE911truth.org). One piece of evidence they cite is the discovery by a team of U.S. and international scientists that the explosive nano-thermite was present in the buildings before they collapsed. Residue of exploded nano-thermite was found in the dust from the collapse of the Towers.

    In polls, nearly half of Americans want a new investigation of 9/11. While Dr. Zelikow may have done an excellent job as the director of the 9/11 Commission, now we know new details about 9/11. His work needs to be informed by this new evidence. Having Dr. Zelikow right here at UVa is an opportunity for our community to openly discuss the old and new evidence regarding 9/11. As Thomas Jefferson said, “We are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.”

    Dr. Thomas P. Hansen
    Albemarle County

    Thanks to The Daily Progress for Bryan McKenzie’s excellent article about the lecture Dr. Philip Zelikow gave at the University of Virginia Miller Center on Aug 31 (“Professor encourages local nation-building). I attended Dr. Zelikow’s lecture, and I was impressed with his ability to apply his expertise to the difficult topic of nation-building.

    As noted in the article and at the lecture, Dr. Zelikow is the former executive director of the 9/11 Commission. He is often commended at UVa for that work.

    But now, new information about 9/11 has been uncovered. For example, more than 1,200 professional architects and engineers are presenting new evidence indicating that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition (AE911truth.org). One piece of evidence they cite is the discovery by a team of U.S. and international scientists that the explosive nano-thermite was present in the buildings before they collapsed. Residue of exploded nano-thermite was found in the dust from the collapse of the Towers.

    In polls, nearly half of Americans want a new investigation of 9/11. While Dr. Zelikow may have done an excellent job as the director of the 9/11 Commission, now we know new details about 9/11. His work needs to be informed by this new evidence. Having Dr. Zelikow right here at UVa is an opportunity for our community to openly discuss the old and new evidence regarding 9/11. As Thomas Jefferson said, “We are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.”

     
    How many skyscrapers fell on 9/11? Print E-mail
    Letters To The Editor
    Friday, 06 August 2010 19:20

    How many skyscrapers fell on 9/11?

    North County Times, May 10, 2010

    Almost every non-9/11 truther to whom I pose the question "How many skyscrapers fell on 9/11?" thinks that there were only two, when in fact, there were three. Building 7, a 47-story building, was not hit by a plane, but fell at free-fall speed for one-third of its seven-second symmetrical collapse.

    When are we going to have a real investigation to figure out what happened on 9/11, which has led to never-ending war, torture and the use of depleted uranium, phosphorus, cluster bombs and bunker buster bombs that kill indiscriminately? Nine-11 truth ends the wars.

    Steve Fahrney
    San Diego

     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

    Page 2 of 3