What's your assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis?

9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign

Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe

Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

Architects & Engineers:
Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner

9/11: Explosive Evidence -
Experts Speak Out - Trailer
Duration: 4:09

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

9/11: Explosive Evidence
Experts Speak Out
Free 1-hour version

FOX TV, Fresno,
with Richard Gage, AIA

CBC - The Fifth Estate
"The Unofficial Story"

The Reality Report
with Richard Gage, AIA

CCTV,
with Richard Gage, AIA

FOX News
with Richard Gage, AIA

Vancouver Omni TV,
with Richard Gage, AIA

Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

Visit our store

What's your assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis?

News - News Releases By AE911Truth

Written by AE911Truth Staff

Wednesday, 21 May 2014 08:22

Introduction by AE911Truth staff

Wood-Ventura-off-the-grid Jesse Ventura interviews Dr. Judy WoodWe've decided to update a three-year-old Frequently Asked Question that is receiving renewed attention in light of three recent episodes of Jesse Ventura's "Off the Grid" show. In the first episode, the host reviews his "Book of the Month Pick," Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. In the next two segments, he conducts a two-part interview with the book's author, Dr. Judy Wood.

Our FAQ asks: "What's your assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis?" Before you read the amended version here, you might want to hear Ventura explain why he finds the DEW theory credible here then listen to Ventura query Dr. Wood on her theory here and here. The segments run a total of 28 minutes.

We trust you'll agree, upon reading our revised FAQ, that it definitively refutes the DEW argument — an argument that, we posit, is nothing more than "a pure hypothesis in search of facts."

If you think we've missed mentioning any other points of divergence between our contention that the Twin Towers were brought down by a combination of explosives and incendiaries and Dr. Wood's claim that directed free energy "dustified" the skyscrapers, be sure to let us know.

By the way, you might also be interested in Ventura's fourth-and-final episode devoted to 9/11, which focuses on World Trade Center 7 and refers to AE911Truth.

And you can catch Richard Gage's response to questions posed to him about Dr. Wood's hypothesis in this seven-minute video, which is also contained in the list of references at the bottom of the FAQ.

READ THE FAQ HERE: https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/353-faq-12-what-is-ae911truth-s-assessment-of-the-directed-energy-weapon-dew-hypothesis

< Prev		Next >

Download High-Quality Video Clips

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

Rapid onset of collapse
Sounds of explosions
Symmetrical structural failure
Free-fall acceleration through the path of what was greatest resistance
Imploded, collapsing completely, landing almost in its own footprint
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional
Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:

FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
Extremely rapid onset of destruction
Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
1200-foot-diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front
Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

The three high-rises exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed