9/11: Explosive Evidence -
Experts Speak Out - Trailer
Duration: 4:09
9/11: Explosive Evidence
Experts Speak Out
Free 1-hour version
| How WTC 7 might have fallen IF it were fatally damaged by fire |
 |
 |
| Neuigkeiten - Neue Veröffentlichungen von AE911Truth | |||
| Samstag, den 30. April 2011 um 00:28 Uhr | |||
|
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung. NIST claims WTC 7 succumbed to "normal office fires". What might it have looked like were that really true? Look at these buildings which succumbed to partial structural damage at their lower floors. Compare the WTC 7 collapse to them.
|
Steven Dusterwald
37-Year S.E. Structural Engineer
What caught my attention was the rapid failure of connections that had to happen in order for Building 7 to come down at the rate that it did.
Robert McCoy
High-Rise Architect
I signed the petition for AE911Truth because I felt it was an organization that was trying to get at the truth of what actually brought those buildings down on 9/11.
Roland Angle
P.E., Civil/Structural Engineer
What really concerns me is we're beginning to live in a society that is rebellious against science. It's important that all of us with the technical expertise speak out on the 9/11 issue.
Kamal Obeid
S.E. Structural Engineer
Structural engineers and other building professionals need to understand that these buildings did not fail the way they are claimed to have failed.
Dan Barnum
FAIA, High-Rise Architect
The tops of the buildings were basically disintegrated.
Anthony Szamboti
B.S.M.E., Mechanical Engineer
The tons of molten metal under just the three WTC buildings that collapsed made me realize that what we're being told about how they collapsed is false.
Gery Warner
P.E. Mechanical Engineer
Molten aluminum is silver. It looks like mercury. The molten metal pouring out of the South Tower is indicative of molten iron, not aluminum.
Flickr
Youtube
Facebook
Twitter