Request for meeting regarding NIST Reports - WTC7 and Twin Towers

[Ed: Copy of original letter dated July 20, 2009]

Dear Dr. Sunder,

We have heard you state publicly after the WTC 7 press conference that it "would not be productive" for you to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. This is quite disappointing – as we now have over 700 architects and engineers at AE911Truth calling for a real investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11. At what point will you take us seriously? Perhaps when our rapidly growing numbers reach 1,000 A/E's?

[Ed: Copy of letter dated July 20, 2009, responding to AIA President Marvin J. Malecha, FAIA, who turned down request from Richard Gage, AIA, to meet with the AIA Board while in Washington, D.C.]

Richard Gage, AIA and staff members from AE911Truth interact with and interview architects and engineers on the convention floor at the recent AIA convention in the nation's capital

Click To Play

It was the best turnout ever forArchitects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Perhaps, the reason for the large turnout was because we spoke in tandem with the new hard-hitting (FF911Truth). The dedicated 9/11 Truth folks in Seattle completely went to town on marketing and brought in a sea of 580 faces. The universities were thoroughly canvassed—including the last minute faculty box stuffing in the Department of Architecture at the University of Washington.

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports

The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.

For Some, the Doubts Began Early

"Something is wrong with this picture," thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings' responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, "How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?"

Read entire article (pdf)